Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27531024›Full record

Trial reportPsycho-oncology2017

Does a peer-led exercise intervention affect sedentary behavior among breast cancer survivors?

Bernardine Pinto, Shira Dunsiger, Kevin Stein

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psycho-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Physical Activity Adoption and Maintenance Among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Trial of Peer Mentoring.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2022
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. An exploratory analysis of 24-h movement behaviors in individuals with cancer completing a 12-week resistance exercise intervention.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  10. What is helpful and not? Patients' opinions and beliefs of how to support reduced sedentary behavior during cancer treatment-a thematic analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Matched and moving: exploring daily social support among women partnered for exercise after a breast cancer diagnosis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Predictors of sedentary behavior among colorectal survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bernardine PintoCollege of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Shira DunsigerMiriam Hospital and W. Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Kevin SteinAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
American Cancer Society · USBrown University · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

Community Volunteers Promoting Physical Activity Among Cancer SurvivorsR01CA132854 · NCI · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI PINTO, BERNARDINE M. · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA132854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSedentary behavior is recognized as an independent risk factor for chronic diseases. Cancer survivors report high levels of sedentary behavior. In secondary analyses, we examined the effects of an exercise intervention on sedentary behavior (sitting time) among breast cancer survivors.

methodsSeventy-six breast cancer survivors (mean age = 55.62 y, mean 1.1 y since diagnosis) were randomized to receive either a 12-week telephone-delivered exercise intervention from peer volunteers or a contact control condition. The intervention did not specifically address sitting time. Participants' sedentary behavior was assessed for 7 days at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks via self-report and objective measurement (accelerometer).

resultsAt baseline, our sample reported sitting for 7.75 hours/day (10.98 h/d by accelerometer data). Spearman rank correlations showed significant positive correlations at baseline between sitting time measured by self-report and accelerometer (ρ = 0.37; P = .002) in the entire sample. There were no significant changes over time within group nor were there any significant intervention effects on sitting time (self-report and objective) at 12 and 24 weeks (all P's > .05).

conclusionsAn exercise intervention that did not focus specifically on sitting time did not affect sedentary behavior among breast cancer survivors. Intervention components that specifically target sitting behavior are needed to reduce this risk behavior among survivors.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorPeer GroupSedentary BehaviorAdultAgedAnxietyBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsDelivery of Health CareDepressionExerciseExercise TherapyFatigueFemaleHumansMiddle Agedcancerexercise interventionsoncologysedentary behaviorsitting

Identifiers

PMID27531024
PMCPMC5581246
OpenAlexW2507194250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.