Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27530958›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Efficient Genome Editing in Apple Using a CRISPR/Cas9 system.

Chikako Nishitani, Narumi Hirai, Sadao Komori, Masato Wada, Kazuma Okada, Keishi Osakabe, Toshiya Yamamoto, Yuriko Osakabe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 142 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed, 342 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Efficient CRISPR/Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Genetic and physiological characteristics ofFrontiers in genome editing · 2024
    Article

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chikako NishitaniNARO Institute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, 2-1 Fujimoto, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8605, Japan.
Narumi HiraiNARO Institute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, 2-1 Fujimoto, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8605, Japan.
Sadao KomoriFaculty of Agriculture, Iwate University, 3-18-8 Ueda, Morioka, Iwate 020-8550, Japan.
Masato WadaNARO Institute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, 92-24, Nabeyashiki, Shimokuriyagawa, Morioka, Iwate 020-0123, Japan.
Kazuma OkadaNARO Institute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, 92-24, Nabeyashiki, Shimokuriyagawa, Morioka, Iwate 020-0123, Japan.
Keishi OsakabeFaculty of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, 2-1 Josanjima, Tokushima 770-8513, Japan.
Toshiya YamamotoNARO Institute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, 2-1 Fujimoto, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8605, Japan.
Yuriko OsakabeFaculty of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, 2-1 Josanjima, Tokushima 770-8513, Japan.
Institute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science · JPTokushima University · JPIwate University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing is a powerful technique for genome modification in molecular research and crop breeding, and has the great advantage of imparting novel desired traits to genetic resources. However, the genome editing of fruit tree plantlets remains to be established. In this study, we describe induction of a targeted gene mutation in the endogenous apple phytoene desaturase (PDS) gene using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Four guide RNAs (gRNAs) were designed and stably transformed with Cas9 separately in apple. Clear and partial albino phenotypes were observed in 31.8% of regenerated plantlets for one gRNA, and bi-allelic mutations in apple PDS were confirmed by DNA sequencing. In addition, an 18-bp gRNA also induced a targeted mutation. These CRIPSR/Cas9 induced-mutations in the apple genome suggest activation of the NHEJ pathway, but with some involvement also of the HR pathway. Our results demonstrate that genome editing can be practically applied to modify the apple genome.

Indexed as

ChimeraCRISPR-Cas SystemsGenome, PlantGene EditingMalusPlant Breeding

Identifiers

PMID27530958
PMCPMC4987624
OpenAlexW2510901304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.