Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27530896›Full record

Observational studySurgical endoscopy2017

Should antithrombotic therapy be stopped in patients undergoing gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection?

Kimihiro Igarashi, Kohei Takizawa, Naomi Kakushima, Masaki Tanaka, Noboru Kawata, Masao Yoshida, Sayo Ito, Kenichiro Imai, Kinichi Hotta, Hirotoshi Ishiwatari and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. [IDEN Consensus on Management of Antithrombotic Agents in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kimihiro IgarashiDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
Kohei TakizawaDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan. k.takizawa@scchr.jp.
Naomi KakushimaDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
Masaki TanakaDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
Noboru KawataDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
Masao YoshidaDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
Sayo ItoDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
Kenichiro ImaiDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
Kinichi HottaDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
Hirotoshi IshiwatariDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
Hiroyuki MatsubayashiDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
Hiroyuki OnoDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of antithrombotic therapy in the patients undergoing gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is of concern. This study aimed to assess delayed bleeding rate after gastric ESD in the patients receiving antithrombotic therapy.

methodsThis study was a retrospective observational study held in a single institute. The patients undergoing gastric ESD from January 2009 to October 2014 were reviewed. Delayed bleeding rate in the patients receiving antithrombotic therapy was compared with that in matched controls. We also compared delayed bleeding rate in the patients continuing antithrombotic therapy with that in the patients with heparin bridging or cessation of antithrombotic therapy. Among 2388 lesions resected by gastric ESD, 367 lesions were resected in the patients with antithrombotic therapy, and 722 lesions were selected as controls. The lesions in the patients receiving antithrombotic therapy were divided into three subgroups: 54 lesions without preoperative cessation (continuation group), 37 lesions with heparin bridging (heparin group), and 276 lesions with cessation of antithrombotic therapy (cessation group).

resultsThe incidence of delayed bleeding was significantly higher in the patients receiving antithrombotic therapy (9.5 % [35/367] vs. 4.2 % [30/722]; p < 0.01). Delayed bleeding rate in continuation group, heparin group, and cessation group was 9.2 % (5/54), 10.8 % (4/37), and 9.4 % (26/276), respectively, and no significant difference was observed. Thrombosis occurred only in cessation group (1.6 %).

conclusionsDelayed bleeding rate associated with gastric ESD is significantly higher in the patients receiving antithrombotic therapy. No significant difference in delayed bleeding rate was observed among patients with and without cessation of antithrombotic therapy. To prevent thrombosis, gastric ESD without cessation may be feasible.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionWithholding TreatmentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsGastric MucosaHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePerioperative CarePostoperative HemorrhageFibrinolytic AgentsAnticoagulantAntiplateletAntithrombotic agentEndoscopyStomach neoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.