Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27530823›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Real-time application of the Rat Grimace Scale as a welfare refinement in laboratory rats.

Vivian Leung, Emily Zhang, Daniel Sj Pang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects of Increased Frequency, High Dose, and Pulsatile Oxytocin Regimens on Abnormal Labor Delivery.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review of Rat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Grimace scale assessment duringFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vivian LeungVeterinary Clinical and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6 Canada.
Emily ZhangVeterinary Clinical and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6 Canada.
Daniel Sj PangVeterinary Clinical and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6 Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rodent grimace scales have been recently validated for pain assessment, allowing evaluation of facial expressions associated with pain. The standard scoring method is retrospective, limiting its application beyond pain research. This study aimed to assess if real-time application of the Rat Grimace Scale (RGS) could reliably and accurately assess pain in rats when compared to the standard method. Thirty-two male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were block randomized into three treatment groups: buprenorphine (0.03 mg/kg, subcutaneously), multimodal analgesia (buprenorphine [0.03 mg/kg] and meloxicam [2 mg/kg], subcutaneously), or saline, followed by intra-plantar carrageenan. Real-time observations (interval and point) were compared to the standard RGS method using concurrent video-recordings. Real-time interval observations reflected the results from the standard RGS method by successfully discriminating between analgesia and saline treatments. Real-time point observations showed poor discrimination between treatments. Real-time observations showed minimal bias (<0.1) and acceptable limits of agreement. These results indicate that applying the RGS in real-time through an interval scoring method is feasible and effective, allowing refinement of laboratory rat welfare through rapid identification of pain and early intervention.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareAnalgesiaAnimalsBuprenorphineCarrageenanComputer SystemsFacial ExpressionFeasibility StudiesFemaleMaleMeloxicamPainPain MeasurementRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRetrospective StudiesBuprenorphineCarrageenanMeloxicamThiazinesThiazoles

Identifiers

PMID27530823
PMCPMC4987703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.