Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27530775›Full record

Trial reportBMC pulmonary medicine2016

e-Vita: design of an innovative approach to COPD disease management in primary care through eHealth application.

E P W A Talboom-Kamp, N A Verdijk, C M G Blom, L M Harmans, I J S H Talboom, M E Numans, N H Chavannes

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E P W A Talboom-KampPublic Health and Primary Care Department, LUMC, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands. E.Talboom@saltro.nl.
N A VerdijkPublic Health and Primary Care Department, LUMC, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands.
C M G BlomZorgdraad Foundation, Wijnand van Arnhemweg 54, Oosterbeek, 6862XN, The Netherlands.
L M HarmansSALTRO Diagnostic Centre, Mississippidreef 83, Utrecht, 3565 CE, The Netherlands.
I J S H TalboomZorgdraad Foundation, Wijnand van Arnhemweg 54, Oosterbeek, 6862XN, The Netherlands.
M E NumansPublic Health and Primary Care Department, LUMC, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands.
N H ChavannesPublic Health and Primary Care Department, LUMC, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands.
Stichting Zorgdraad · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOPD is a highly complex disease to manage as patients show great variation in symptoms and limitations in daily life. In the last decade self-management support of COPD has been introduced as an effective method to improve quality and efficiency of care, and to reduce healthcare costs. Despite the urge to change the organisation of health care and the potential of eHealth to support this, large-scale implementation in daily practice remains behind, especially in the Netherlands. METHODS/

designWe designed a multilevel study, called e-Vita, to investigate different organisational implementation methods of a self-management web portal to support and empower patients with COPD in three different primary care settings. Using a parallel cohort design, the clinical effects of the web portal will be assessed using an interrupted times series (ITS) study design and measured according to changes in health status with the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ). The different implementations and net benefits of self-management through eHealth on clinical outcomes will be evaluated from human, organisational, and technical perspectives. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge this is the first study to combine different study designs that enable simultaneous investigation of clinical effects, as well as effects of different organisational implementation methods whilst controlling for confounding effects of the organisational characteristics. We hypothesize that an implementation with higher levels of personal assistance, and integrated in an existing care program will result in increased use of and satisfaction with the platform, thereby increasing health status and diminishing exacerbation and hospitalisation.

trial registrationNTR4098 (31-07-2013).

Indexed as

Disease ManagementDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedHealth Care CostsHealth StatusHumansInternetNetherlandsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrimary Health CareProspective StudiesPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveResearch DesignSelf CareSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineChronically illCOPDeHealthIntegrated disease managementPrimary careSelf-managementTelemonitoring

Identifiers

PMID27530775
PMCPMC4987980
OpenAlexW2514299613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.