Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27530698›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2016

Distinct current modules shape cellular dynamics in model neurons.

Adel Alturki, Feng Feng, Ajay Nair, Vinay Guntu, Satish S Nair

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Microcircuitry and oscillation features across model cortical regions.The ... Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems conference proceedings : MWSCAS. Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems · 2025
    Article
  4. Gamma Oscillations in the Basolateral Amygdala: Localization, Microcircuitry, and Behavioral Correlates.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Model neocortical microcircuit supports beta and gamma rhythms.International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering : [proceedings]. International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering · 2021
    Article
  7. An Efficient Pipeline for Biophysical Modeling of Neurons.International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering : [proceedings]. International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering · 2021
    Article
  8. Inferring Morphology of a Neuron from In Vivo LFP Data.International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering : [proceedings]. International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adel AlturkiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Feng FengDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Ajay NairVeteran's Hospital, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Vinay GuntuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Satish S NairDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States. Electronic address: nairs@missouri.edu.

Funding

CRCNS: Modeling Acquisition and Extinction of Fear Memories in Amygdala CircuitsR01MH087755 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI NAIR, SATISH S · 2009 to 2011
$728k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous intrinsic currents are known to collectively shape neuronal membrane potential dynamics, or neuronal signatures. Although how sets of currents shape specific signatures such as spiking characteristics or oscillations has been studied individually, it is less clear how a neuron's suite of currents jointly shape its entire set of signatures. Biophysical conductance-based models of neurons represent a viable tool to address this important question. We hypothesized that currents are grouped into distinct modules that shape specific neuronal characteristics or signatures, such as resting potential, sub-threshold oscillations, and spiking waveforms, for several classes of neurons. For such a grouping to occur, the currents within one module should have minimal functional interference with currents belonging to other modules. This condition is satisfied if the gating functions of currents in the same module are grouped together on the voltage axis; in contrast, such functions are segregated along the voltage axis for currents belonging to different modules. We tested this hypothesis using four published example case models and found it to be valid for these classes of neurons. This insight into the neurobiological organization of currents also suggests an intuitive, systematic, and robust methodology to develop biophysical single-cell models with multiple biological characteristics applicable for both hand- and automated-tuning approaches. We illustrate the methodology using two example case rodent pyramidal neurons, from the lateral amygdala and the hippocampus. The methodology also helped reveal that a single-core compartment model could capture multiple neuronal properties. Such biophysical single-compartment models have potential to improve the fidelity of large network models.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAmygdalaAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaHippocampusMembrane PotentialsNeuronsOlfactory BulbRodentiabiophysical modelcurrent modulesneuronal signatures

Identifiers

PMID27530698
PMCPMC5086448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.