Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27530600›Full record

ReviewAutonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical2017

Can we predict the blood pressure response to renal denervation?

Gregory D Fink, Jeremiah T Phelps

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Autonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An Update on the Role of Renal Artery Denervation in the Treatment of Hypertension.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. 2022 Renal denervation therapy for the treatment of hypertension: a statement from the Thai Hypertension Society.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gregory D FinkDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Michigan State University, 1355 Bogue Street, East Lansing, MI 48840, USA. Electronic address: finkg@msu.edu.
Jeremiah T PhelpsDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Michigan State University, 1355 Bogue Street, East Lansing, MI 48840, USA. Electronic address: phelps11@msu.edu.

Funding

SIGNALING MECHANISMS IN ARTERIES AND VEINS IN HYPERTENSIONP01HL070687 · NHLBI · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WATTS, STEPHANIE W · 2003 to 2019
$22.8M
Long-Term Neural Determinants of Cardiovascular DiseasesR01HL076312 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI OSBORN, JOHN W · 2005 to 2009
$5.6M
Targeted Sympathetic Ablation for Treatment of HypertensionR01HL116476 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI OSBORN, JOHN W · 2014 to 2022
$3.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL070687NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL076312NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal denervation (RDN) is a new therapy used to treat drug-resistant hypertension in the clinical setting. Published human trials show substantial inter-individual variability in the blood pressure (BP) response to RDN, even when technical aspects of the treatment are standardized as much as possible between patients. Widespread acceptance of RDN for treating hypertension will require accurate identification of patients likely to respond to RDN with a fall in BP that is clinically significant in magnitude, well-maintained over time and does not cause adverse consequences. In this paper we review and evaluate clinical studies that address possible predictors of the BP response to RDN. We conclude that only one generally reliable predictor has been identified to date, namely pre-RDN BP level, although there is some evidence for a few other factors. Experimental interventions in laboratory animals provide the opportunity to explore potential predictors that are difficult to investigate in human patients. Therefore we also describe results (from our lab and others) with RDN in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Since virtually all patients receiving RDN are taking three or more antihypertensive drugs, a particular focus of our work was on how ongoing antihypertensive drug treatment might alter the BP response to RDN. We conclude that patient age (or duration of hypertension) and concomitant treatment with certain drugs can affect the blood pressure response to RDN and that this information could help predict a favorable clinical response.

Indexed as

Blood PressureDenervationAgingAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansHypertensionKidneyMaleRatsRats, Inbred SHRAnti-hypertensive drugsHypertensionRenal nervesSpontaneously hypertensive rat

Identifiers

PMID27530600
PMCPMC5280812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.