Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27530529›Full record

Trial reportPsycho-oncology2017

Psychosocial outcomes of an electronic self-report assessment and self-care intervention for patients with cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Jesse R Fann, Fangxin Hong, Barbara Halpenny, Traci M Blonquist, Donna L Berry

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psycho-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The efficacy of web or mobile-based interventions to alleviate emotional symptoms in people with advanced cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Distress Management, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2019
    Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jesse R FannDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Fangxin HongDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Barbara HalpennyPhyllis F. Cantor Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Traci M BlonquistDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Donna L BerryPhyllis F. Cantor Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Computerized Assessment for Patients with Cancer: ESRA-C IIR01NR008726 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BERRY, DONNA L. · 2004 to 2009
$3.4M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR008726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of Web-based technology to facilitate self-care and communication with health care providers has the potential to improve psychosocial outcomes for patients undergoing cancer treatment. This study reports an analysis of psychosocial outcomes of the electronic self-report assessment for cancer study.

methodsAdult patients starting cancer therapy were randomized to receive usual education about symptoms and quality of life topics (control) or usual education plus self-care instruction for symptoms and quality of life issues, communication coaching, and the opportunity to track symptoms and quality of life between clinic visits (intervention). Depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and social, emotional, and role functioning (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 subscales) were measured before treatment (T1), 3 to 6 weeks after starting treatment (T2), 2 weeks later (T3), and 2 to 4 weeks after treatment ended or at the next restaging visit for participants who continued to receive treatment (T4). Clinicians received summaries of participant reports at each time point in both groups.

resultsIn multivariable analysis, the depression scores were significantly lower (P = .04) and there was a trend to higher social and role functioning (P = .07) in the intervention group compared with the control. Working status was significantly associated with lower depression and better social and role functioning.

conclusionsA patient-centered, Web-based intervention that facilitates self-care and communication can improve psychosocial outcomes in the cancer setting.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSelf CareSelf ReportAdultAmbulatory CareCommunicationDepressionFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatient-Centered CarePatient Education as Topiccancerdepressiononcologyoutcomespsychosocialquality of life

Identifiers

PMID27530529
PMCPMC6169530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.