Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27530456›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2016

Maternally-derived antibodies do not prevent transmission of swine influenza A virus between pigs.

Charlie Cador, Séverine Hervé, Mathieu Andraud, Stéphane Gorin, Frédéric Paboeuf, Nicolas Barbier, Stéphane Quéguiner, Céline Deblanc, Gaëlle Simon, Nicolas Rose

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charlie CadorSwine Epidemiology and Welfare Research Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), BP 53, 22440, Ploufragan, France. charlie.cador@anses.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-9386-8313
Séverine HervéSwine Virology Immunology Research Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), BP 53, 22440, Ploufragan, France.
Mathieu AndraudSwine Epidemiology and Welfare Research Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), BP 53, 22440, Ploufragan, France.
Stéphane GorinSwine Virology Immunology Research Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), BP 53, 22440, Ploufragan, France.
Frédéric PaboeufSPF Pig Production and Experimental Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), BP 53, 22440, Ploufragan, France.
Nicolas BarbierSwine Virology Immunology Research Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), BP 53, 22440, Ploufragan, France.
Stéphane QuéguinerSwine Virology Immunology Research Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), BP 53, 22440, Ploufragan, France.
Céline DeblancSwine Virology Immunology Research Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), BP 53, 22440, Ploufragan, France.
Gaëlle SimonSwine Virology Immunology Research Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), BP 53, 22440, Ploufragan, France.
Nicolas RoseSwine Epidemiology and Welfare Research Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), BP 53, 22440, Ploufragan, France.
Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail · FRVirologie et Immunologie Moléculaires · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A transmission experiment involving 5-week-old specific-pathogen-free (SPF) piglets, with (MDA(+)) or without maternally-derived antibodies (MDA(-)), was carried out to evaluate the impact of passive immunity on the transmission of a swine influenza A virus (swIAV). In each group (MDA(+)/MDA(-)), 2 seeders were placed with 4 piglets in direct contact and 5 in indirect contact (3 replicates per group). Serological kinetics (ELISA) and individual viral shedding (RT-PCR) were monitored for 28 days after infection. MDA waning was estimated using a nonlinear mixed-effects model and survival analysis. Differential transmission rates were estimated depending on the piglets' initial serological status and contact structure (direct contact with pen-mates or indirect airborne contact). The time to MDA waning was 71.3 [52.8-92.1] days on average. The airborne transmission rate was 1.41 [0.64-2.63] per day. The compared shedding pattern between groups showed that MDA(+) piglets had mainly a reduced susceptibility to infection compared to MDA(-) piglets. The resulting reproduction number estimated in MDA(+) piglets (5.8 [1.4-18.9]), although 3 times lower than in MDA(-) piglets (14.8 [6.4-27.1]), was significantly higher than 1. Such an efficient and extended spread of swIAV at the population scale in the presence of MDAs could contribute to swIAV persistence on farms, given the fact that the period when transmission is expected to be impacted by the presence of MDAs can last up to 10 weeks.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ViralFemaleImmunity, Maternally-AcquiredInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza VaccinesMaleOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsPregnancySwineSwine DiseasesAntibodies, ViralInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID27530456
PMCPMC4988049
OpenAlexW2512358314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.