Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27530343›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2016

Mobile learning devices in the workplace: 'as much a part of the junior doctors' kit as a stethoscope'?

Rebecca Dimond, Alison Bullock, Joseph Lovatt, Mark Stacey

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mobile app use by medical students and residents in the clinical setting: an exploratory study.The journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Utility of mobile learning in Electrocardiography.European heart journal. Digital health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Can a smartphone app improve medical trainees' knowledge of antibiotics?International journal of medical education · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca DimondRebecca Dimond, Cardiff School of Social Sciences, 10/12 Museum Place, Cardiff, CF10 3BG, UK. DimondR1@cardiff.ac.uk.
Alison BullockRebecca Dimond, Cardiff School of Social Sciences, 10/12 Museum Place, Cardiff, CF10 3BG, UK.
Joseph LovattRebecca Dimond, Cardiff School of Social Sciences, 10/12 Museum Place, Cardiff, CF10 3BG, UK.
Mark StaceyRebecca Dimond, Cardiff School of Social Sciences, 10/12 Museum Place, Cardiff, CF10 3BG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmartphones are ubiquitous and commonly used as a learning and information resource. They have potential to revolutionize medical education and medical practice. The iDoc project provides a medical textbook smartphone app to newly-qualified doctors working in Wales. The project was designed to assist doctors in their transition from medical school to workplace, a period associated with high levels of cognitive demand and stress.

methodsNewly qualified doctors submitted case reports (n = 293) which detail specific instances of how the textbook app was used. Case reports were submitted via a structured online form (using Bristol Online Surveys - BOS) which gave participants headings to elicit a description of: the setting/context; the problem/issue addressed; what happened; any obstacles involved; and their reflections on the event. Case reports were categorised by the purpose of use, and by elements of the quality improvement framework (IoM 2001). They were then analysed thematically to identify challenges of use.

resultsAnalysis of the case reports revealed how smartphones are a viable tool to address clinical questions and support mobile learning. They contribute to novice doctors' provision of safe, effective, timely, efficient and patient-centred care. The case reports also revealed considerable challenges for doctors using mobile technology within the workplace. Participants reported concern that using a mobile phone in front of patients and staff might appear unprofessional.

conclusionMobile phones blur boundaries between the public and private, and the personal and professional. In contrast to using a mobile as a communication device, using a smartphone as an information resource in the workplace requires different rituals. Uncertain etiquette of mobile use may reduce the capacity of smartphone technology to improve the learning experience of newly qualified doctors.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneMobile ApplicationsReference Books, MedicalClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, ContinuingHumansInformation DisseminationInformation Seeking BehaviorInservice TrainingMedical StaffPatient CarePatient SafetyWalesLearning resourcesPatient careQuality improvementSmartphonesTechnology enhanced learningWorkplace learning

Identifiers

PMID27530343
PMCPMC4988031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.