Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27530342›Full record

ReviewChromosoma2016

Holocentromere identity: from the typical mitotic linear structure to the great plasticity of meiotic holocentromeres.

André Marques, Andrea Pedrosa-Harand

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosoma, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nematode chromosomes.Genetics · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Rewiring Meiosis for Crop Improvement.Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Versatility of multivalent orientation, inverted meiosis, and rescued fitness in holocentric chromosomal hybrids.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

André MarquesLaboratory of Genetic Resources, Campus Arapiraca, Federal University of Alagoas, Arapiraca, Alagoas, 57309-005, Brazil.
Andrea Pedrosa-HarandLaboratory of Plant Cytogenetics and Evolution, Department of Botany, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, 50670-420, Brazil. andrea.pedrosaharand@pq.cnpq.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5213-4770
Universidade Federal de Alagoas · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The centromere is the chromosomal site of kinetochore assembly and is responsible for the correct chromosome segregation during mitosis and meiosis in eukaryotes. Contrary to monocentrics, holocentric chromosomes lack a primary constriction, what is attributed to a kinetochore activity along almost the entire chromosome length during mitosis. This extended centromere structure imposes a problem during meiosis, since sister holocentromeres are not co-oriented during first meiotic division. Thus, regardless of the relatively conserved somatic chromosome structure of holocentrics, during meiosis holocentric chromosomes show different adaptations to deal with this condition. Recent findings in holocentrics have brought back the discussion of the great centromere plasticity of eukaryotes, from the typical CENH3-based holocentromeres to CENH3-less holocentric organisms. Here, we summarize recent and former findings about centromere/kinetochore adaptations shown by holocentric organisms during mitosis and meiosis and discuss how these adaptations are related to the type of meiosis found.

Indexed as

AnimalsArthropodsCentromereChromosomesChromosome SegregationKinetochoresMeiosisMitosisNematodaPlantsSpindle ApparatusCENH3Centromere plasticityHolocentromereMeiosisMitosis

Identifiers

PMID27530342
OpenAlexW2513986205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.