ReviewBrain sciences2016
Standardization of Data for Clinical Use and Research in Spinal Cord Injury.
Review in Brain sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Life expectancy and long-term survival after traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Caspase-1 and Inflammasome Signaling in Spinal Cord Injury: Mechanistic Insights and Translational Gaps.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation for Functional Rehabilitation After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Guttmann Lecture 2025: standardization of data collection in individuals with spinal cord injury.Spinal cord · 2026Review
- Design, Simulation and Functional Testing of a Novel Ankle Exoskeleton with 3DOFs.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Physiotherapy Strategies for Redefining Recovery in a Patient With Grade II Ependymoma: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- Bowel and Bladder Dysfunction after SCI: A Comparison between India and Canada.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Reliability and validity of the Hebrew version of the International Spinal Cord Injury Activities and Participation Basic Data Set.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2023Observational
- Computer International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) algorithms: a review.Spinal cord · 2023Review
- First contact of care for persons with spinal cord injury: a general practitioner or a spinal cord injury specialist?BMC family practice · 2021Article
- A one-year prospective study on the occurrence of traumatic spinal cord injury and clinical complications during hospitalisation in North-East Tanzania.African health sciences · 2021Article
- Substantiating Clinical Effectiveness and Potential Barriers to the Widespread Implementation of Spinal Cord Injury Telerehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis of Randomized Trials in the Recent Past Decade.Telemedicine reports · 2021Article
- Combined Supra- and Sub-Lesional Epidural Electrical Stimulation for Restoration of the Motor Functions after Spinal Cord Injury in Mini Pigs.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Content comparison of the Spinal Cord Injury Model System Database to the ICF Generic Sets and Core Sets for spinal cord injury.Spinal cord · 2019Article
- Reproducibility of the international spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set: an international psychometric study.Spinal cord · 2019Article
- Article
- Translation and validation of two International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Data Sets-a modified process.Spinal cord series and cases · 2019Article
- Bioinformatic Analysis of Potential Biomarkers for Spinal Cord-injured Patients with Intractable Neuropathic Pain.The Clinical journal of pain · 2018Article
- Epidemiological Characteristics of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (TSCI) in the Middle-East and North-Africa (MENA) Region: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Bulletin of emergency and trauma · 2018Review
- Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Registries: Improving Care across the SCI Care Continuum by Identifying Knowledge Gaps.Journal of neurotrauma · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increased survival after spinal cord injury (SCI) worldwide has enhanced the need for quality data that can be compared and shared between centers, countries, as well as across research studies, to better understand how best to prevent and treat SCI. Such data should be standardized and be able to be uniformly collected at any SCI center or within any SCI study. Standardization will make it possible to collect information from larger SCI populations for multi-center research studies. With this aim, the international SCI community has obtained consensus regarding the best available data and measures for use in SCI clinical practice and research. Reporting of SCI data is likewise standardized. Data elements are continuously updated and developed using an open and transparent process. There are ongoing internal, as well as external review processes, where all interested parties are encouraged to participate. The purpose of this review paper is to provide an overview of the initiatives to standardize data including the International Spinal Cord Society's International SCI Data Sets and the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Common Data Elements Project within SCI and discuss future opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.