Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27528823›Full record

ArticleUlusal cerrahi dergisi2016

Laparoscopic resection for colorectal diseases: short-term outcomes of a single center.

Wafi Attaallah, Hayyam Babayev, Samet Yardımcı, Asım Cingi, Mustafa Ümit Uğurlu, Ömer Günal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ulusal cerrahi dergisi, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wafi AttaallahDepartment of General Surgery, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Hayyam BabayevDepartment of General Surgery, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Samet YardımcıDepartment of General Surgery, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Asım CingiDepartment of General Surgery, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Mustafa Ümit UğurluDepartment of General Surgery, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Ömer GünalDepartment of General Surgery, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEven though, laparoscopy is not accepted as the current gold standard in colorectal surgery, it can be performed as safely as open surgery. It is also widely accepted that the technique has many advantages. In this study, we evaluated the results of 33 patients with laparoscopic colorectal resection. MATERIAL AND

methodsThirty-three patients who underwent laparoscopic colon surgery between January 2013 and September 2014 in the General Surgery Clinic at Marmara University Hospital were included in the study. Patients were evaluated in terms of their demographic and tumor histopathologic characteristics, type of surgery and early postoperative complications.

resultsLaparoscopic colorectal resection was performed for 33 patients who had malignant or benign lesions. The median age was 60 (35-70), and 18 (55%) were male patients. The majority of the patients (90%) were diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma. Half of the patients were T3 and 67% had N0 stage. The median number of retrieved lymph nodes was 17 (4-28). Negative surgical margins were obtained in all patients. The postoperative hospital stay was 5 (4-16) days. Postoperative early complications were observed in only 5 patients. The majority of complications were treated without the need for surgery. No mortality was recorded in this series of patients.

conclusionThis study showed that laparoscopic colorectal surgery could be performed safely based on its low complication rate, short length of hospital stay, providing sufficient surgical resection and lymph node dissection.

Indexed as

colon resectioncolorectal surgeryLaparoscopy

Identifiers

PMID27528823
PMCPMC4970779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.