Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27528785›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

Flap or soar? How a flight generalist responds to its aerial environment.

Judy Shamoun-Baranes, Willem Bouten, E Emiel van Loon, Christiaan Meijer, C J Camphuysen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Judy Shamoun-BaranesComputational Geo-Ecology, IBED, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1090GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands shamoun@uva.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1652-7646
Willem BoutenComputational Geo-Ecology, IBED, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1090GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5250-8872
E Emiel van LoonComputational Geo-Ecology, IBED, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1090GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8895-0427
Christiaan MeijerNetherlands eScience Center, Science Park 140, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5529-5761
C J CamphuysenDepartment Coastal Systems, NIOZ Royal Institute for Sea Research and Utrecht University, PO Box 59, 1790 AB Den Burg, Texel, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3469-9070
University of Amsterdam · NLNetherlands eScience Center · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aerial environment is heterogeneous in space and time and directly influences the costs of animal flight. Volant animals can reduce these costs by using different flight modes, each with their own benefits and constraints. However, the extent to which animals alter their flight modes in response to environmental conditions has rarely been studied in the wild. To provide insight into how a flight generalist can reduce the energetic cost of movement, we studied flight behaviour in relation to the aerial environmental and landscape using hundreds of hours of global positioning system and triaxial acceleration measurements of the lesser black-backed gull (Larus fuscus). Individuals differed largely in the time spent in flight, which increased linearly with the time spent in flight at sea. In general, flapping was used more frequently than more energetically efficient soaring flight. The probability of soaring increased with increasing boundary layer height and time closer to midday, reflecting improved convective conditions supportive of thermal soaring. Other forms of soaring flight were also used, including fine-scale use of orographic lift. We explore the energetic consequences of behavioural adaptations to the aerial environment and underlying landscape and implications for individual energy budgets, foraging ecology and reproductive success.This article is part of the themed issue 'Moving in a moving medium: new perspectives on flight'.

Indexed as

EnvironmentFlight, AnimalAnimalsCharadriiformesEnergy MetabolismFeeding BehaviorNetherlandsWings, Animalaccelerometerforaging ecologyGPSorographic liftsoarthermal convection

Identifiers

PMID27528785
PMCPMC4992719
OpenAlexW2518271547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.