Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27528600›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2016

The Impact of Receiving Predictive Genetic Information about Lynch Syndrome on Individual Colonoscopy and Smoking Behaviors.

Joanne Soo-Min Kim, Peter C Coyte, Michelle Cotterchio, Louise A Keogh, Louisa B Flander, Clara Gaff, Audrey Laporte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cohort Profile: The Colon Cancer Family Registry Cohort (CCFRC).International journal of epidemiology · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joanne Soo-Min KimInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. joanne.kim@mail.utoronto.ca.
Peter C CoyteInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Michelle CotterchioPrevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada.
Louise A KeoghCentre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Louisa B FlanderCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Clara GaffDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Audrey LaporteInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

ONTARIO REGISTRY FOR STUDIES OF FAMILIAL COLON CANCERU01CA074783 · NCI · CANCER CARE ONTARIO · PI GALLINGER, STEVEN · 1997 to 2008
$12.5M
Colon Cancer Family Registry CohortUM1CA167551 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HAILE, ROBERT WILLIAM, JENKINS, MARK A · 2013 to 2017
$11.3M
AUSTRALASIAN COLORECTAL CANCER FAMILY REGISTRYU01CA097735 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE · PI HOPPER, JOHN L · 2002 to 2007
$6.9M
The Colon Cancer Family Registry: AustralasiaU24CA097735 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE · PI HOPPER, JOHN L · 2008 to 2011
$6.2M
The Colon Cancer Family Registry: OntarioU24CA074783 · NCI · CANCER CARE ONTARIO · PI GALLINGER, STEVEN · 2008 to 2011
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA074783NCI NIH HHS U01 CA097735NCI NIH HHS U24 CA074783NCI NIH HHS U24 CA097735NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA167551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigated whether receiving the results of predictive genetic testing for Lynch syndrome, indicating the presence or absence of an inherited predisposition to various cancers, including colorectal cancer, was associated with change in individual colonoscopy and smoking behaviors, which could prevent colorectal cancer.

methodsThe study population included individuals with no previous diagnosis of colorectal cancer, whose families had already identified deleterious mutations in the mismatch repair or EPCAM genes. Hypotheses were generated from a simple health economics model and tested against individual-level panel data from the Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry.

resultsThe empirical analysis revealed evidence consistent with some of the hypotheses, with a higher likelihood of undergoing colonoscopy in those who discovered their genetic predisposition to colorectal cancer and a lower likelihood of quitting smoking in those who discovered their lack thereof.

conclusionsPredictive genetic information about Lynch syndrome was associated with change in individual colonoscopy and smoking behaviors but not necessarily in ways to improve population health. IMPACT: The study findings suggest that the impact of personalized medicine on disease prevention is intricate, warranting further analyses to determine the net benefits and costs. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(11); 1524-33. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseSmokingAdultAgedColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA Mismatch RepairFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalPrecision Medicine

Identifiers

PMID27528600
PMCPMC5274544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.