Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27528526›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2016

Development and validation of the ASPIRE-VA coaching fidelity checklist (ACFC): a tool to help ensure delivery of high-quality weight management interventions.

Laura J Damschroder, David E Goodrich, Hyungjin Myra Kim, Robert Holleman, Leah Gillon, Susan Kirsh, Caroline R Richardson, Lesley D Lutes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Developing an implementation fidelity measure for a family healthy weight program.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura J DamschroderVA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Rd., Mailstop 152, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA. laura.damschroder@va.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-3657-8459
David E GoodrichVA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Rd., Mailstop 152, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.
Hyungjin Myra KimVA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Rd., Mailstop 152, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.
Robert HollemanVA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Rd., Mailstop 152, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.
Leah GillonVA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Rd., Mailstop 152, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.
Susan KirshLouis Stokes Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 10701 East Blvd., Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Caroline R RichardsonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, 1018 Fuller St., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-0708, USA.
Lesley D LutesDepartment of Psychology, East Carolina University, 344-B Rawl, East Fifth St., Greenville, NC, 27858-4353, USA.

Funding

Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mehboob A Hussain · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Practical and valid instruments are needed to assess fidelity of coaching for weight loss. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the ASPIRE Coaching Fidelity Checklist (ACFC). Classical test theory guided ACFC development. Principal component analyses were used to determine item groupings. Psychometric properties, internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability were evaluated for each subscale. Criterion validity was tested by predicting weight loss as a function of coaching fidelity. The final 19-item ACFC consists of two domains (session process and session structure) and five subscales (sets goals and monitor progress, assess and personalize self-regulatory content, manages the session, creates a supportive and empathetic climate, and stays on track). Four of five subscales showed high internal consistency (Cronbach alphas > 0.70) for group-based coaching; only two of five subscales had high internal reliability for phone-based coaching. All five sub-scales were positively and significantly associated with weight loss for group- but not for phone-based coaching. The ACFC is a reliable and valid instrument that can be used to assess fidelity and guide skill-building for weight management interventionists.

Indexed as

ChecklistDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMaleMentoringMiddle AgedObesityPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsWeight Reduction ProgramsInterventionObesityProcess evaluationTreatment fidelityWeight management

Identifiers

PMID27528526
PMCPMC4987596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.