Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27528393›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Validation of the Dutch language version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-NL).

Marck Htm Haerkens, Wouter van Leeuwen, J Bryan Sexton, Peter Pickkers, Johannes G van der Hoeven

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marck Htm HaerkensDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. marck.haerkens@radboudumc.nl.
Wouter van LeeuwenFaculty of Psychology University of Amsterdam, PO Box 15804, 1001, NH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Bryan SextonDepartment of Psychiatry, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA.
Peter PickkersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Johannes G van der HoevenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Medical Center · NLDuke University Health System · USNetherlands Defence Academy · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the first objective of caring for patients is to do no harm, patient safety is a priority in delivering clinical care. An essential component of safe care in a clinical department is its safety climate. Safety climate correlates with safety-specific behaviour, injury rates, and accidents. Safety climate in healthcare can be assessed by the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), which provides insight by scoring six dimensions: Teamwork Climate, Job Satisfaction, Safety Climate, Stress Recognition, Working Conditions and Perceptions of Management. The objective of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Dutch language version of the SAQ in a variety of clinical departments in Dutch hospitals.

methodsThe Dutch version (SAQ-NL) of the SAQ was back translated, and analyzed for semantic characteristics and content. From October 2010 to November 2015 SAQ-NL surveys were carried out in 17 departments in two university and seven large non-university teaching hospitals in the Netherlands, prior to a Crew Resource Management human factors intervention. Statistical analyses were used to examine response patterns, mean scores, correlations, internal consistency reliability and model fit. Cronbach's α's and inter-item correlations were calculated to examine internal consistency reliability.

resultsOne thousand three hundred fourteen completed questionnaires were returned from 2113 administered to health care workers, resulting in a response rate of 62 %. Confirmatory Factor Analysis revealed the 6-factor structure fit the data adequately. Response patterns were similar for professional positions, departments, physicians and nurses, and university and non-university teaching hospitals. The SAQ-NL showed strong internal consistency (α = .87). Exploratory analysis revealed differences in scores on the SAQ dimensions when comparing different professional positions, when comparing physicians to nurses and when comparing university to non-university hospitals.

conclusionsThe SAQ-NL demonstrated good psychometric properties and is therefore a useful instrument to measure patient safety climate in Dutch clinical work settings. As removal of one item resulted in an increased reliability of the Working Conditions dimension, revision or deletion of this item should be considered. The results from this study provide researchers and practitioners with insight into safety climate in a variety of departments and functional positions in Dutch hospitals.

Indexed as

LanguagePatient SafetyTranslationsAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMedical Staff, HospitalNetherlandsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSafety ManagementSurveys and QuestionnairesCrew Resource Management (CRM)Dutch hospital settingHuman factorsSafety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ)

Identifiers

PMID27528393
PMCPMC4986249
OpenAlexW2512971153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.