Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27528259›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2016

A Set of Assays for the Comprehensive Analysis of FMR1 Alleles in the Fragile X-Related Disorders.

Bruce E Hayward, Yifan Zhou, Daman Kumari, Karen Usdin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Characterization ofFrontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. CGG Repeat Expansion, and ElevatedFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bruce E HaywardSection on Gene Structure and Disease, Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Yifan ZhouSection on Gene Structure and Disease, Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Daman KumariSection on Gene Structure and Disease, Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Karen UsdinSection on Gene Structure and Disease, Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Electronic address: ku@helix.nih.gov.

Funding

Understanding the mutational mechanism responsible for the Repeat Expansion DiseasesZIADK057808 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI USDIN, KAREN P. · 2009 to 2025
$14.1M
The pathology consequences of repeat expansion in the Repeat Expansion DiseasesZIADK057602 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI USDIN, KAREN P. · 2009 to 2025
$11.5M
Mechanism of repeat expansion in Fragile X syndromeZ01DK057808 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI USDIN, KAREN P. · 2007 to 2008
$570k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DK057808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis and study of the fragile X-related disorders is complicated by the difficulty of amplifying the long CGG/CCG-repeat tracts that are responsible for disease pathology, the potential presence of AGG interruptions within the repeat tract that can ameliorate expansion risk, the occurrence of variable DNA methylation that modulates disease severity, and the high frequency of mosaicism for both repeat number and methylation status. These factors complicate patient risk assessment. In addition, the variability in these parameters that is seen when patient cells are grown in culture requires their frequent monitoring to ensure reproducible results in a research setting. Many existing assays have the limited ability to amplify long alleles, particularly in a mixture of different allele sizes. Others are better at this, but are too expensive for routine use in most laboratories or for newborn screening programs and use reagents that are proprietary. We describe herein a set of assays to routinely evaluate all of these important parameters in a time- and cost-effective way.

Indexed as

AllelesGenetic TestingMutationCell LineDNA MethylationFemaleFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Fragile X SyndromeHumansMalePolymerase Chain ReactionPromoter Regions, GeneticTrinucleotide Repeat ExpansionTrinucleotide RepeatsWorkflowFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1

Identifiers

PMID27528259
PMCPMC5807930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.