Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27528046›Full record

SynthesisGenetic epidemiology2016

A meta-analytic framework for detection of genetic interactions.

Yulun Liu, Yong Chen, Paul Scheet

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Genetic epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yulun LiuDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, The University of Texas, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Yong ChenDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Paul ScheetDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, The University of Texas, Houston, TX 77030, USA. pscheet@alum.wustl.edu.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Population Genomics and "Next-gen" Sequencing DataR01HG005859 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SCHEET, PAUL A · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
Statistical Methods and Software for Multivariate Meta-analysisR21LM012197 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CHU, HAITAO · 2015 to 2016
$385k
Multivariate Meta-anaylsis of Diagnostic TestsR03HS022900 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CHEN, YONG · 2014 to 2015
$100k
AHRQ HHS R03 HS022900NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005859NLM NIH HHS R21 LM012197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With varying, but substantial, proportions of heritability remaining unexplained by summaries of single-SNP genetic variation, there is a demand for methods that extract maximal information from genetic association studies. One source of variation that is difficult to assess is genetic interactions. A major challenge for naive detection methods is the large number of possible combinations, with a requisite need to correct for multiple testing. Assumptions of large marginal effects, to reduce the search space, may be restrictive and miss higher order interactions with modest marginal effects. In this paper, we propose a new procedure for detecting gene-by-gene interactions through heterogeneity in estimated low-order (e.g., marginal) effect sizes by leveraging population structure, or ancestral differences, among studies in which the same phenotypes were measured. We implement this approach in a meta-analytic framework, which offers numerous advantages, such as robustness and computational efficiency, and is necessary when data-sharing limitations restrict joint analysis. We effectively apply a dimension reduction procedure that scales to allow searches for higher order interactions. For comparison to our method, which we term phylogenY-aware Effect-size Tests for Interactions (YETI), we adapt an existing method that assumes interacting loci will exhibit strong marginal effects to our meta-analytic framework. As expected, YETI excels when multiple studies are from highly differentiated populations and maintains its superiority in these conditions even when marginal effects are small. When these conditions are less extreme, the advantage of our method wanes. We assess the Type-I error and power characteristics of complementary approaches to evaluate their strengths and limitations.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticGenetic Association StudiesPhenotypeResearch Designcase-control designgene-gene interactionheterogeneitymega-analysismeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID27528046
PMCPMC5081230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.