Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27527700›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2016

Evaluation of the vector competence of a native UK mosquito Ochlerotatus detritus (Aedes detritus) for dengue, chikungunya and West Nile viruses.

Marcus S C Blagrove, Ken Sherlock, Gail E Chapman, Daniel E Impoinvil, Philip J McCall, Jolyon M Medlock, Gareth Lycett, Tom Solomon, Matthew Baylis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Emerging Mosquito-Borne Threats and the Response from European and Eastern Mediterranean Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Review
  20. Assessment of the Public Health Threats Posed by Vector-Borne Disease in the United Kingdom (UK).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcus S C BlagroveDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. marcus.blagrove@liverpool.ac.uk.
Ken SherlockDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Gail E ChapmanDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Daniel E ImpoinvilCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA.
Philip J McCallVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Jolyon M MedlockNational Institute of Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Gareth LycettVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Tom SolomonDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Matthew BaylisDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections at University of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F021933/1Department of Health IS-HPU-1112-10117Department of Health RP-PG-0108-10048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date there has been no evidence of mosquito-borne virus transmission of public health concern in the UK, despite the occurrence of more than 30 species of mosquito, including putative vectors of arboviruses. The saltmarsh mosquito Ochlerotatus detritus [syn. Aedes (Ochlerotatus) detritus] is locally common in parts of the UK where it can be a voracious feeder on people.

methodsHere, we assess the competence of O. detritus for three major arboviruses: dengue virus (DENV), chikungunya virus (CHIKV) and West Nile virus (WNV) using adult mosquitoes reared from wild, field-obtained immatures.

resultsWe demonstrate laboratory competence for WNV at 21 °C, with viral RNA detected in the mosquito's saliva 17 days after oral inoculation. By contrast, there was no evidence of laboratory competence of O. detritus for either DENV or CHIKV.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate competence of a UK mosquito for WNV and confirms that O. detritus may present a potential risk for arbovirus transmission in the UK and that further investigation of its vector role in the wild is required.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsChikungunya virusDengue VirusFemaleInsect VectorsOchlerotatusUnited KingdomWest Nile virusAedesArbovirusCHIKVDENVMosquitoOchlerotatusVector competenceWNV

Identifiers

PMID27527700
PMCPMC4986171
OpenAlexW2517302123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.