ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2016
Towards Malaria Elimination: Monitoring and Evaluation of the "1-3-7" Approach at the China-Myanmar Border.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review of evidence for the impact and effectiveness of the 1-3-7 strategy for malaria elimination.Malaria journal · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Implementation and fidelity of reactive surveillance and response strategies for malaria elimination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- The burden and trends of infectious diseases among children aged 14 and below in China from 1990 to 2021: a systematic analysis from the 2021 global burden of disease study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The 1,7-malaria reactive community-based testing and response (1,7-mRCTR) approach in Tanzania: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2024Article
- Malaria reporting timeliness analysis and factors associated with delayed notification, 2018-2022, Nepal.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Successful elimination of falciparum malaria following the introduction of community-based health workers in Eastern Myanmar: A retrospective analysis.PLoS medicine · 2023Article
- Factors Contributing to the Pre-Elimination of Malaria from Hainan Island, China, 1986-2009.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2023Article
- 1-3-7 surveillance and response approach in malaria elimination: China's practice and global adaptions.Malaria journal · 2023Review
- Environmental Factors Linked to Reporting of Active Malaria Foci in Thailand.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023Article
- Achievements of the national malaria control and elimination program in the People's Republic of China: the Atlas of Malaria Transmission in China.Frontiers of medicine · 2023Article
- Implementing a novel capture and ligation probe-PCR method in mass screen and treatment to support malaria elimination efforts in the China-Myanmar border region.Malaria journal · 2023Article
- Policy Implications of the Southern and Central Africa International Center of Excellence for Malaria Research: Ten Years of Malaria Control Impact Assessments in Hypo-, Meso-, and Holoendemic Transmission Zones in Zambia and Zimbabwe.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2022Article
- Assessing Thailand's 1-3-7 surveillance strategy in accelerating malaria elimination.Malaria journal · 2022Article
- Role of international network on surveillance and response system leading to malaria elimination: China's engagement in global health.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2022Article
- Developing sero-diagnostic tests to facilitate Plasmodium vivax Serological Test-and-Treat approaches: modeling the balance between public health impact and overtreatment.BMC medicine · 2022Article
- Spatio-Temporal Variation of Malaria Incidence and Risk Factors in West Gojjam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia.Environmental health insights · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of joint 3 + 1 malaria strategy along China-Myanmar cross border areas.BMC infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Epidemiologic Analysis of Efforts to Achieve and Sustain Malaria Elimination along the China-Myanmar Border.Emerging infectious diseases · 2021Article
- A retrospective analysis of malaria epidemiological characteristics in Yingjiang County on the China-Myanmar border.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The surveillance and response system remains one of the biggest challenges to malaria elimination along the China-Myanmar border. In China, "1-3-7" approach was developed to guide elimination activities according to the National Malaria Elimination Program, which is a simplified set of targets that delineates responsibilities and actions. The time frame of the approach has been incorporated into the nationwide web-based disease reporting system: 1, case reporting within 1 day after diagnosis; 3, case investigation within 3 days; and 7, focus investigation and action within 7 days. Herein, the data on malaria cases in 2005-2014 and after the "1-3-7" implementation in 2013-2014 of the 18 counties at the China-Myanmar border are reviewed and analyzed. Results showed that the total cases decreased while the proportion of imported cases rose. The "1-3-7" was well executed, except for the "3" indicator, which was 96.3% accomplished on average in the 18 border counties, but needs to be further strengthened. More efforts are highlighted for timely and accurate case detection as well as proactive mapping of disease transmission hot spots to facilitate the elimination of border malaria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.