Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27527603›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2016

What's keeping people after stroke from walking outdoors to become physically active? A qualitative study, using an integrated biomedical and behavioral theory of functioning and disability.

Jacqueline Outermans, Jan Pool, Ingrid van de Port, Japie Bakers, Harriet Wittink

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Co-design of a walking activity intervention for stroke survivors.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jacqueline OutermansResearch Group Lifestyle and Health, Research Centre for Innovations in Healthcare, Hogeschool Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Heidelberglaan 7, 3584CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands. jacqueline.outermans@hu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4439-0883
Jan PoolResearch Group Lifestyle and Health, Research Centre for Innovations in Healthcare, Hogeschool Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Heidelberglaan 7, 3584CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ingrid van de PortRevant, Brabantlaan 1, 4817JW, Breda, The Netherlands.
Japie BakersUtrecht University Medical Centre, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Harriet WittinkResearch Group Lifestyle and Health, Research Centre for Innovations in Healthcare, Hogeschool Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Heidelberglaan 7, 3584CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht · NLRevant (Netherlands) · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn general people after stroke do not meet the recommendations for physical activity to conduct a healthy lifestyle. Programs to stimulate walking activity to increase physical activity are based on the available insights into barriers and facilitators to physical activity after stroke. However, these programs are not entirely successful. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively explore perceived barriers and facilitators to outdoor walking using a model of integrated biomedical and behavioral theory, the Physical Activity for people with a Disability model (PAD).

methodsIncluded were community dwelling respondents after stroke, classified ≥ 3 at the Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC), purposively sampled regarding the use of healthcare. The data was collected triangulating in a multi-methods approach, i.e. semi-structured, structured and focus-group interviews. A primarily deductive thematic content analysis using the PAD-model in a framework-analysis' approach was conducted after verbatim transcription.

results36 respondents (FAC 3-5) participated in 16 semi-structured interviews, eight structured interviews and two focus-group interviews. The data from the interviews covered all domains of the PAD model. Intention, ability and opportunity determined outdoor walking activity. Personal factors determined the intention to walk outdoors, e.g. negative social influence, resulting from restrictive caregivers in the social environment, low self-efficacy influenced by physical environment, and also negative attitude towards physical activity. Walking ability was influenced by loss of balance and reduced walking distance and by impairments of motor control, cognition and aerobic capacity as well as fatigue. Opportunities arising from household responsibilities and lively social constructs facilitated outdoor walking.

conclusionTo stimulate outdoor walking activity, it seems important to influence the intention by addressing social influence, self-efficacy and attitude towards physical activity in the development of efficient interventions. At the same time, improvement of walking ability and creation of opportunity should be considered.

Indexed as

StrokeExerciseFemaleHumansIntentionMaleMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesQualitative ResearchSelf EfficacyStroke RehabilitationWalkingCommunity ambulationOutdoor walkingPhysical activityStroke

Identifiers

PMID27527603
PMCPMC4986174
OpenAlexW2514202986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.