Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27527563›Full record

Observational studyThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases

Serum levels of vancomycin: is there a prediction using doses in mg/kg/day or m(2)/day for neonates?

Roberta Maia de Castro Romanelli, Lêni Márcia Anchieta, Juliana Chaves Abreu Fernandes, Mariana Antunes Faria Lima, Taís Marina de Souza, Viviane Rosado, Wanessa Trindade Clemente, Paulo Augusto Moreira Camargos

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roberta Maia de Castro RomanelliUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Pediatria, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Hospital das Clínicas, Comité de Controle de Infeções, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. Electronic address: rmcromanelli@unifenas.br.
Lêni Márcia AnchietaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Pediatria, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Hospital das Clínicas, Unidade Neonatal de Cuidados Progressivos, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Juliana Chaves Abreu FernandesUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Hospital das Clínicas, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Mariana Antunes Faria LimaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Hospital das Clínicas, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Taís Marina de SouzaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Pediatria, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Viviane RosadoUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Hospital das Clínicas, Comité de Controle de Infeções, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Wanessa Trindade ClementeUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Pediatria, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Hospital das Clínicas, Comité de Controle de Infeções, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Paulo Augusto Moreira CamargosUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Pediatria, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus has been identified as the main nosocomial agent of neonatal late-onset sepsis. However, based on the pharmacokinetics and erratic distribution of vancomycin, recommended empirical dose is not ideal, due to the inappropriate serum levels that have been measured in neonates. The aim of this study was to evaluate serum levels of vancomycin used in newborns and compare the prediction of adequate serum levels based on doses calculated according to mg/kg/day and m(2)/day. This is an observational reprospective cohort at a referral neonatal unit, from 2011 to 2013. Newborns treated with vancomycin for the first episode of late-onset sepsis were included. Total dose in mg/kg/day, dose/m(2)/day, age, weight, body surface and gestational age were identified as independent variables. For predictive analysis of adequate serum levels, multiple linear regressions were performed. The Receiver Operating Characteristic curve for proper serum vancomycin levels was also obtained. A total of 98 patients received 169 serum dosages of the drug, 41 (24.3%) of the doses had serum levels that were defined as appropriate. Doses prescribed in mg/kg/day and dose/m(2)/day predicted serum levels in only 9% and 4% of cases, respectively. Statistical significance was observed with higher doses when the serum levels were considered as appropriate (p<0.001). A dose of 27mg/kg/day had a sensitivity of 82.9% to achieve correct serum levels of vancomycin. Although vancomycin has erratic serum levels and empirical doses cannot properly predict the target levels, highest doses in mg/kg/day were associated with adequate serum levels.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLinear ModelsMaleNeonatal SepsisPredictive Value of TestsReference ValuesRetrospective StudiesStaphylococcusStatistics, NonparametricAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycinDrug dosage calculationsInfantNewbornPharmacokineticsSepsisVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID27527563
PMCPMC9425495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.