Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27527561›Full record

ArticleBrain connectivity2016

Sex and Age Effects of Functional Connectivity in Early Adulthood.

Chao Zhang, Nathan D Cahill, Mohammad R Arbabshirani, Tonya White, Stefi A Baum, Andrew M Michael

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain connectivity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Connectivity Regression.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Functional connectome through the human life span.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chao Zhang1 Autism and Developmental Medicine Institute , Geisinger Health System, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.
Nathan D Cahill2 Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology , Rochester, New York.
Mohammad R Arbabshirani4 Institute for Advanced Application , Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Tonya White5 Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital , Rotterdam, The Netherlands .
Stefi A Baum2 Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology , Rochester, New York.
Andrew M Michael1 Autism and Developmental Medicine Institute , Geisinger Health System, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional connectivity (FC) in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) is widely used to find coactivating regions in the human brain. Despite its widespread use, the effects of sex and age on resting FC are not well characterized, especially during early adulthood. Here we apply regression and graph theoretical analyses to explore the effects of sex and age on FC between the 116 AAL atlas parcellations (a total of 6670 FC measures). rs-fMRI data of 494 healthy subjects (203 males and 291 females; age range: 22-36 years) from the Human Connectome Project were analyzed. We report the following findings. (1) Males exhibited greater FC than females in 1352 FC measures (1025 survived Bonferroni correction; [Formula: see text]). In 641 FC measures, females exhibited greater FC than males but none survived Bonferroni correction. Significant FC differences were mainly present in frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes. Although the average FC values for males and females were significantly different, FC values of males and females exhibited large overlap. (2) Age effects were present only in 29 FC measures and all significant age effects showed higher FC in younger subjects. Age and sex differences of FC remained significant after controlling for cognitive measures. (3) Although sex [Formula: see text] age interaction did not survive multiple comparison correction, FC in females exhibited a faster cross-sectional decline with age. (4) Male brains were more locally clustered in all lobes but the cerebellum; female brains had a higher clustering coefficient at the whole-brain level. Our results indicate that although both male and female brains show small-world network characteristics, male brains were more segregated and female brains were more integrated. Findings of this study further our understanding of FC in early adulthood and provide evidence to support that age and sex should be controlled for in FC studies of young adults.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsBrainCognitionConnectomeFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysSex CharacteristicsSex FactorsYoung Adultage effectsearly adulthoodfMRIfunctional connectivityresting-state fMRIsex effects

Identifiers

PMID27527561
PMCPMC5105352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.