Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27527515›Full record

ArticleGenetics2016

Statistical Methods for Testing Genetic Pleiotropy.

Daniel J Schaid, Xingwei Tong, Beth Larrabee, Richard B Kennedy, Gregory A Poland, Jason P Sinnwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mapping pleiotropic loci using a fast-sequential testing algorithm.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2021
    Article
  14. Mapping pleiotropic loci using a fast-sequential testing algorithm.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A powerful and versatile colocalization test.PLoS computational biology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel J SchaidDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905 schaid@mayo.edu.
Xingwei TongSchool of Statistics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Beth LarrabeeDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
Richard B KennedyMayo Clinic Vaccine Research Group, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
Gregory A PolandMayo Clinic Vaccine Research Group, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
Jason P SinnwellDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.

Funding

Quantitative Methods for Genetic EpidemiologyR01GM065450 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SCHAID, DANIEL J. · 2002 to 2020
$5.6M
Genetic Markers of Long-Term Mumps Vaccine ImmunityR01AI127365 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KENNEDY, RICHARD B · 2016 to 2020
$3.6M
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI040065NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI127365NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic pleiotropy is when a single gene influences more than one trait. Detecting pleiotropy and understanding its causes can improve the biological understanding of a gene in multiple ways, yet current multivariate methods to evaluate pleiotropy test the null hypothesis that none of the traits are associated with a variant; departures from the null could be driven by just one associated trait. A formal test of pleiotropy should assume a null hypothesis that one or no traits are associated with a genetic variant. For the special case of two traits, one can construct this null hypothesis based on the intersection-union (IU) test, which rejects the null hypothesis only if the null hypotheses of no association for both traits are rejected. To allow for more than two traits, we developed a new likelihood-ratio test for pleiotropy. We then extended the testing framework to a sequential approach to test the null hypothesis that [Formula: see text] traits are associated, given that the null of k traits are associated was rejected. This provides a formal testing framework to determine the number of traits associated with a genetic variant, while accounting for correlations among the traits. By simulations, we illustrate the type I error rate and power of our new methods; describe how they are influenced by sample size, the number of traits, and the trait correlations; and apply the new methods to multivariate immune phenotypes in response to smallpox vaccination. Our new approach provides a quantitative assessment of pleiotropy, enhancing current analytic practice.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalGenetic PleiotropyModels, TheoreticalComputer SimulationGenetic LinkageGenetic VariationHumansPhenotypeQuantitative Trait Lociconstrained modellikelihood-ratio testmultivariate analysisseemingly unrelated regressionsequential testing

Identifiers

PMID27527515
PMCPMC5068841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.