Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27527240›Full record

Trial reportSpinal cord2017

Effectiveness of amitriptyline and lamotrigine in traumatic spinal cord injury-induced neuropathic pain: a randomized longitudinal comparative study.

N Agarwal, M Joshi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Spinal cord, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Shaping the Action Potential in Dorsal Root and Trigeminal Ganglia Neurons: Relevance to Pain Mechanisms.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N AgarwalPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, India.
M JoshiDepartment of PMR, SMS Medical College & Associate Hospital Jaipur, Jaipur, India.
Sawai ManSingh Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRandomized longitudinal comparative study.

objectivesTo compare the efficacy of lamotrigine and amitriptyline in the management of traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI)-induced neuropathic pain (NP).

settingSawai Man Singh Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, India.

methodsA total of 147 individuals with NP were randomized for a 3-week trial of either amitriptyline or lamotrigine. Amitriptyline was administered orally at doses of 25, 50 and 100 mg once daily at night time, and lamotrigine was administered orally at doses of 25, 50 and 100 mg twice daily, both for 1 week by means of optional titration. Assessment of NP was done at baseline and thereafter at 1, 2 and 3 weeks using Short-form MC Gill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SFMPQ2) scores.

resultsThere was a significant difference between the mean values of the SFMPQ2 score at baseline and those at each follow-up for amitriptyline. Similar results were seen in the lamotrigine group. When the differences in mean SFMPQ2 scores at different time frames from baseline were compared with those of the other group, values were found to be nonsignificant as seen on the Mann-Whitney U-test.

conclusionsThese findings support the use of both amitriptyline and lamotrigine in the management of NP after traumatic SCI.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentAdultAmitriptylineAnticonvulsantsAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIndiaLamotrigineLongitudinal StudiesMaleNeuralgiaPain MeasurementAmitriptylineAnticonvulsantsAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicLamotrigineTriazines

Identifiers

PMID27527240
OpenAlexW2508655404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.