Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27527231›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2016

Microfluidic Devices for Forensic DNA Analysis: A Review.

Brigitte Bruijns, Arian van Asten, Roald Tiggelaar, Han Gardeniers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brigitte BruijnsMesoscale Chemical Systems, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede 7500 AE, The Netherlands. b.b.bruijns@utwente.nl.
Arian van AstenNetherlands Forensic Institute, Laan van Ypenburg 6, The Hague 2497 GB, The Netherlands. clhc-science@uva.nl.
Roald TiggelaarMesoscale Chemical Systems, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede 7500 AE, The Netherlands. r.m.tiggelaar@utwente.nl.
Han GardeniersMesoscale Chemical Systems, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede 7500 AE, The Netherlands. j.g.e.gardeniers@utwente.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microfluidic devices may offer various advantages for forensic DNA analysis, such as reduced risk of contamination, shorter analysis time and direct application at the crime scene. Microfluidic chip technology has already proven to be functional and effective within medical applications, such as for point-of-care use. In the forensic field, one may expect microfluidic technology to become particularly relevant for the analysis of biological traces containing human DNA. This would require a number of consecutive steps, including sample work up, DNA amplification and detection, as well as secure storage of the sample. This article provides an extensive overview of microfluidic devices for cell lysis, DNA extraction and purification, DNA amplification and detection and analysis techniques for DNA. Topics to be discussed are polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on-chip, digital PCR (dPCR), isothermal amplification on-chip, chip materials, integrated devices and commercially available techniques. A critical overview of the opportunities and challenges of the use of chips is discussed, and developments made in forensic DNA analysis over the past 10-20 years with microfluidic systems are described. Areas in which further research is needed are indicated in a future outlook.

Indexed as

DNALab-On-A-Chip DevicesMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesForensic MedicineHumansMicrofluidicsNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesDNAcell lysischipsDNA extraction and purificationisothermal amplification reactionsmicrofluidicsPCR

Identifiers

PMID27527231
PMCPMC5039660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.