Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27526196›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Virtual Reconstruction and Three-Dimensional Printing of Blood Cells as a Tool in Cell Biology Education.

Ingrid Augusto, Douglas Monteiro, Wendell Girard-Dias, Thaisa Oliveira Dos Santos, Simone Letícia Rosa Belmonte, Jairo Pinto de Oliveira, Helder Mauad, Marcos da Silva Pacheco, Dominik Lenz, Athelson Stefanon Bittencourt and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ingrid AugustoLaboratório de Ultraestrutura Celular Carlos Alberto Redins, Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil.
Douglas MonteiroInstituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho e Centro Nacional de Biologia Estrutural e Bioimagem, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Wendell Girard-DiasInstituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho e Centro Nacional de Biologia Estrutural e Bioimagem, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Thaisa Oliveira Dos SantosLaboratório de Ultraestrutura Celular Carlos Alberto Redins, Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil.
Simone Letícia Rosa BelmontePontifica Universidade Católica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jairo Pinto de OliveiraLaboratório de Ultraestrutura Celular Carlos Alberto Redins, Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil.
Helder MauadDepartamento de Fisiologia, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil.
Marcos da Silva PachecoDepartamento de Morfologia, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil.
Dominik LenzCiências Farmacêuticas, Universidade de Vila Velha, Vila Velha, Brazil.
Athelson Stefanon BittencourtMuseu de Ciências da Vida, Vitória, Brazil.
Breno Valentim NogueiraLaboratório de Ultraestrutura Celular Carlos Alberto Redins, Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil.
Jorge Roberto Lopes Dos SantosPontifica Universidade Católica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Kildare MirandaInstituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho e Centro Nacional de Biologia Estrutural e Bioimagem, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Marco Cesar Cunegundes GuimarãesLaboratório de Ultraestrutura Celular Carlos Alberto Redins, Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo · BRNational Institute of Science and Technology for Structural Biology and Bioimaging · BRPontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro · BRMuseu da Amazonia · BRUniversidade Vila Velha · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cell biology discipline constitutes a highly dynamic field whose concepts take a long time to be incorporated into the educational system, especially in developing countries. Amongst the main obstacles to the introduction of new cell biology concepts to students is their general lack of identification with most teaching methods. The introduction of elaborated figures, movies and animations to textbooks has given a tremendous contribution to the learning process and the search for novel teaching methods has been a central goal in cell biology education. Some specialized tools, however, are usually only available in advanced research centers or in institutions that are traditionally involved with the development of novel teaching/learning processes, and are far from becoming reality in the majority of life sciences schools. When combined with the known declining interest in science among young people, a critical scenario may result. This is especially important in the field of electron microscopy and associated techniques, methods that have greatly contributed to the current knowledge on the structure and function of different cell biology models but are rarely made accessible to most students. In this work, we propose a strategy to increase the engagement of students into the world of cell and structural biology by combining 3D electron microscopy techniques and 3D prototyping technology (3D printing) to generate 3D physical models that accurately and realistically reproduce a close-to-the native structure of the cell and serve as a tool for students and teachers outside the main centers. We introduce three strategies for 3D imaging, modeling and prototyping of cells and propose the establishment of a virtual platform where different digital models can be deposited by EM groups and subsequently downloaded and printed in different schools, universities, research centers and museums, thereby modernizing teaching of cell biology and increasing the accessibility to modern approaches in basic science.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalAnimalsBlood CellsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleRatsRats, WistarTomographyUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID27526196
PMCPMC4985121
OpenAlexW2508134052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.