Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27525823›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioenergetics and biomembranes2016

Role of mitochondrial complex I and protective effect of CoQ10 supplementation in propofol induced cytotoxicity.

Christian Bergamini, Noah Moruzzi, Francesco Volta, Laura Faccioli, Jantje Gerdes, Maria Cristina Mondardini, Romana Fato

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Coenzyme Q10 and Xenobiotic Metabolism: An Overview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Effects of coenzyme Q10 in a propofol infusion syndrome model of rabbits.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian BergaminiDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 48, Bologna, Italy.
Noah MoruzziInstitute for Diabetes and Regeneration Research, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Parkring 11, 85478, Garching, Germany.
Francesco VoltaInstitute for Diabetes and Regeneration Research, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Parkring 11, 85478, Garching, Germany.
Laura FaccioliDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 48, Bologna, Italy.
Jantje GerdesInstitute for Diabetes and Regeneration Research, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Parkring 11, 85478, Garching, Germany.
Maria Cristina MondardiniDepartment of Paediatric Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy.
Romana FatoDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 48, Bologna, Italy. romana.fato@unibo.it.
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DEUniversity of Bologna · ITPoliclinico S.Orsola-Malpighi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) is an anaesthetic widely used for human sedation. Due to its intrinsic antioxidant properties, rapid induction of anaesthesia and fast recovery, it is employed in paediatric anaesthesia and in the intensive care of premature infants. Recent studies have pointed out that exposure to anaesthesia in the early stage of life might be responsible of long-lasting cognitive impairment. The apoptotic neurodegeneration induced by general anaesthetics (GA) involves mitochondrial impairment due to the inhibition of the OXPHOS machinery. In the present work, we aim to identify the main mitochondrial respiratory chain target of propofol toxicity and to evaluate the possible protective effect of CoQ10 supplementation. The propofol effect on the mitochondrial functionality was assayed in isolated mitochondria and in two cell lines (HeLa and T67) by measuring oxygen consumption rate. The protective effect of CoQ10 was assessed by measuring cells viability, NADH-oxidase activity and ATP/ADP ratio in cells treated with propofol. Our results show that propofol reduces cellular oxygen consumption rate acting mainly on mitochondrial Complex I. The kinetic analysis of Complex I inhibition indicates that propofol interferes with the Q module acting as a non-competitive inhibitor with higher affinity for the free form of the enzyme. Cells supplemented with CoQ10 are more resistant to propofol toxicity. Propofol exposure induces cellular damages due to mitochondrial impairment. The site of propofol inhibition on Complex I is the Q module. CoQ10 supplementation protects cells against the loss of energy suggesting its possible therapeutic role to minimizing the detrimental effects of general anaesthesia.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorCell RespirationCell SurvivalDietary SupplementsElectron Transport Complex IHeLa CellsHumansHypnotics and SedativesMitochondriaOxygen ConsumptionPropofolUbiquinonecoenzyme Q10Electron Transport Complex IHypnotics and SedativesPropofolUbiquinoneAnaesthesiaComplex IMitochondriaOxygen consumptionPropofol

Identifiers

PMID27525823
OpenAlexW2508326502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.