Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27525693›Full record

Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2017

Predictors of unsuccessful pessary fitting in women with prolapse: a cross-sectional study in general practice.

Chantal M C R Panman, Marian Wiegersma, Boudewijn J Kollen, Huibert Burger, Marjolein Y Berger, Janny H Dekker

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03615872 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction With Pessary in the Treatment of Genital Prolapse

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospital, CaenRan2018 to 2025Enrolled150ConditionsGenital Prolapse, Pessary, SatisfactionArmspessary use
NCT06021769 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Longitudinal Assessment of Pessary Experience

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2023 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsPelvic Organ Prolapse, Stress Urinary IncontinenceArmsObservational only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Patient-Centered Goals for Treatment of Pelvic Floor Disorders.Current bladder dysfunction reports · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The effect of pessary treatment on puborectalis muscle function.International urogynecology journal · 2021
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chantal M C R PanmanDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marian WiegersmaDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Boudewijn J KollenDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Huibert BurgerDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marjolein Y BergerDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Janny H DekkerDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands. j.h.dekker@umcg.nl.
University of Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisPelvic organ prolapse is a common condition. There is inconsistency between predictors of unsuccessful pessary fitting in urological/gynaecological clinics. Research in general practice is scarce. The aim was to estimate the proportion of women in general practice with a symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse and unsuccessful pessary fitting, and to identify characteristics associated with unsuccessful pessary fitting.

methodsA cross-sectional study in general practice (n = 20) was carried out among women (≥55 years) with symptomatic prolapse (n = 78). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of unsuccessful pessary fitting.

resultsIn total, 33 women (42 %) had unsuccessful pessary fitting. Factors associated with unsuccessful pessary fitting were age (per year, OR 0.93 [95 % CI 0.87-1.00]), body mass index (per kg/m

conclusionsPessary fitting was successful in 58 %, indicating that pessary treatment may be suitable for many, but not for all women in general practice with symptomatic prolapse. The condition of the pelvic floor probably plays a role in the success of pessary fitting, as demonstrated by the association with underactive pelvic floor muscles, and body mass index. The association with age may reflect the higher acceptance of conservative treatments for prolapse in older women. This is the first study on predictive factors for unsuccessful pessary fitting in general practice. Therefore, further research should seek to confirm these associations before we can recommend the use of this information in patient counselling.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPelvic FloorPelvic Organ ProlapsePessariesPrimary Health CareRegression AnalysisRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeGeneral practicePelvic organ prolapsePessariesPredictionRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID27525693
PMCPMC5306061
OpenAlexW2513140407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.