ArticlePloS one2016
3D-Printing for Analytical Ultracentrifugation.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of three AUC techniques for the determination of the loading status and capsid titer of AAVs.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2023Article
- Article
- Analysis of plant cuticles and their interactions with agrochemical surfactants using a 3D printed diffusion chamber.Plant methods · 2023Article
- Characterization of DNA-protein complexes by nanoparticle tracking analysis and their association with systemic lupus erythematosus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Low-cost and open-source strategies for chemical separations.Journal of chromatography. A · 2021Review
- A calibration disk for the correction of radial errors from chromatic aberration and rotor stretch in the Optima AUC™ analytical ultracentrifuge.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2020Article
- Analytical Ultracentrifugation (AUC): An Overview of the Application of Fluorescence and Absorbance AUC to the Study of Biological Macromolecules.Current protocols in molecular biology · 2020Article
- Using modern approaches to sedimentation velocity to detect conformational changes in proteins.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2020Article
- Sedimentation Velocity Analytical Ultracentrifugation Analysis of Marketed Rituximab Drug Product Size Distribution.Pharmaceutical research · 2020Article
- Resuspending samples in analytical ultracentrifugation.Analytical biochemistry · 2020Article
- Efficient data acquisition with three-channel centerpieces in sedimentation velocity.Analytical biochemistry · 2019Article
- Enhanced Sample Handling for Analytical Ultracentrifugation with 3D-Printed Centerpieces.Analytical chemistry · 2019Article
- A Reappraisal of Sedimentation Nonideality Coefficients for the Analysis of Weak Interactions of Therapeutic Proteins.The AAPS journal · 2019Article
- Measuring Ultra-Weak Protein Self-Association by Non-ideal Sedimentation Velocity.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2019Article
- Measuring macromolecular size distributions and interactions at high concentrations by sedimentation velocity.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation for characterization of therapeutic antibodies.Biophysical reviews · 2018Review
- A 'smart' tube holder enables real-time sample monitoring in a standard lab centrifuge.PloS one · 2018Article
- Use of fluorescence-detected sedimentation velocity to study high-affinity protein interactions.Nature protocols · 2017Article
- Sedimentation of Reversibly Interacting Macromolecules with Changes in Fluorescence Quantum Yield.Biophysical journal · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) is a classical technique of physical biochemistry providing information on size, shape, and interactions of macromolecules from the analysis of their migration in centrifugal fields while free in solution. A key mechanical element in AUC is the centerpiece, a component of the sample cell assembly that is mounted between the optical windows to allow imaging and to seal the sample solution column against high vacuum while exposed to gravitational forces in excess of 300,000 g. For sedimentation velocity it needs to be precisely sector-shaped to allow unimpeded radial macromolecular migration. During the history of AUC a great variety of centerpiece designs have been developed for different types of experiments. Here, we report that centerpieces can now be readily fabricated by 3D printing at low cost, from a variety of materials, and with customized designs. The new centerpieces can exhibit sufficient mechanical stability to withstand the gravitational forces at the highest rotor speeds and be sufficiently precise for sedimentation equilibrium and sedimentation velocity experiments. Sedimentation velocity experiments with bovine serum albumin as a reference molecule in 3D printed centerpieces with standard double-sector design result in sedimentation boundaries virtually indistinguishable from those in commercial double-sector epoxy centerpieces, with sedimentation coefficients well within the range of published values. The statistical error of the measurement is slightly above that obtained with commercial epoxy, but still below 1%. Facilitated by modern open-source design and fabrication paradigms, we believe 3D printed centerpieces and AUC accessories can spawn a variety of improvements in AUC experimental design, efficiency and resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.