Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27525655›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Divergence within and among Seaweed Siblings (Fucus vesiculosus and F. radicans) in the Baltic Sea.

Angelica Ardehed, Daniel Johansson, Lisa Sundqvist, Ellen Schagerström, Zuzanna Zagrodzka, Nikolaj A Kovaltchouk, Lena Bergström, Lena Kautsky, Marina Rafajlovic, Ricardo T Pereyra and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Angelica ArdehedDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Daniel JohanssonDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lisa SundqvistCentre for Marine Evolutionary Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ellen SchagerströmDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Zuzanna ZagrodzkaCentre for Marine Evolutionary Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Nikolaj A KovaltchoukKomarov Botanical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, St Petersburg, Russia.
Lena BergströmDepartment of Aquatic Resources, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Öregrund, Sweden.
Lena KautskyDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marina RafajlovicCentre for Marine Evolutionary Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ricardo T PereyraCentre for Marine Evolutionary Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Kerstin JohannessonCentre for Marine Evolutionary Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0176-7986
University of Gothenburg · SEStockholm University · SERussian Academy of Sciences · RUSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Closely related taxa provide significant case studies for understanding evolution of new species but may simultaneously challenge species identification and definition. In the Baltic Sea, two dominant and perennial brown algae share a very recent ancestry. Fucus vesiculosus invaded this recently formed postglacial sea 8000 years ago and shortly thereafter Fucus radicans diverged from this lineage as an endemic species. In the Baltic Sea both species reproduce sexually but also recruit fully fertile new individuals by asexual fragmentation. Earlier studies have shown local differences in morphology and genetics between the two taxa in the northern and western Bothnian Sea, and around the island of Saaremaa in Estonia, but geographic patterns seem in conflict with a single origin of F. radicans. To investigate the relationship between northern and Estonian distributions, we analysed the genetic variation using 9 microsatellite loci in populations from eastern Bothnian Sea, Archipelago Sea and the Gulf of Finland. These populations are located in between earlier studied populations. However, instead of bridging the disparate genetic gap between N-W Bothnian Sea and Estonia, as expected from a simple isolation-by-distance model, the new populations substantially increased overall genetic diversity and showed to be strongly divergent from the two earlier analysed regions, showing signs of additional distinct populations. Contrasting earlier findings of increased asexual recruitment in low salinity in the Bothnian Sea, we found high levels of sexual reproduction in some of the Gulf of Finland populations that inhabit extremely low salinity. The new data generated in this study supports the earlier conclusion of two reproductively isolated but very closely related species. However, the new results also add considerable genetic and morphological complexity within species. This makes species separation at geographic scales more demanding and suggests a need for more comprehensive approaches to further disentangle the intriguing relationship and history of the Baltic Sea fucoids.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationOceans and SeasEuropeFucusGene FrequencyGenotypeMicrosatellite RepeatsSalinity

Identifiers

PMID27525655
PMCPMC4985153
OpenAlexW2508022024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.