Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27525501›Full record

ArticleGenetic testing and molecular biomarkers2016

Evolution of Hereditary Breast Cancer Genetic Services: Are Changes Reflected in the Knowledge and Clinical Practices of Florida Providers?

Deborah Cragun, Courtney Scherr, Lucia Camperlengo, Susan T Vadaparampil, Tuya Pal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Video Education on Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) for Physicians: an Interventional Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deborah Cragun1 Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute , Tampa, Florida.
Courtney Scherr3 Department of Communication Studies, Northwestern University , Chicago, Illinois.
Lucia Camperlengo1 Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute , Tampa, Florida.
Susan T Vadaparampil1 Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute , Tampa, Florida.
Tuya Pal1 Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute , Tampa, Florida.

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsWe describe practitioner knowledge and practices related to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) in an evolving landscape of genetic testing.

methodsA survey was mailed in late 2013 to Florida providers who order HBOC testing. Descriptive statistics were conducted to characterize participants' responses.

resultsOf 101 respondents, 66% indicated either no genetics education or education through a commercial laboratory. Although 79% of respondents were aware of the Supreme Court ruling resulting in the loss of Myriad Genetics' BRCA gene patent, only 19% had ordered testing from a different laboratory. With regard to pretest counseling, 78% of respondents indicated they usually discuss 11 of 14 nationally recommended elements for informed consent. Pretest discussion times varied from 3 to 120 min, with approximately half spending <20 min. Elements not routinely covered by >40% of respondents included (1) possibility of a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) and (2) issues related to life/disability insurance. With regard to genetic testing for HBOC, 88% would test an unaffected sister of a breast cancer patient identified with a BRCA VUS.

conclusionsResults highlight the need to identify whether variability in hereditary cancer service delivery impacts patient outcomes. Findings also reveal opportunities to facilitate ongoing outreach and education.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDelivery of Health CareGenetic ServicesHealth PersonnelFemaleFloridaHumansBRCAgenetic knowledgegenetic service deliverygenetic testinghereditary breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID27525501
PMCPMC7871987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.