Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27525309›Full record

ArticleTranslational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine2016

Leveraging Citizen Science and Information Technology for Population Physical Activity Promotion.

Abby C King, Sandra J Winter, Jylana L Sheats, Lisa G Rosas, Matthew P Buman, Deborah Salvo, Nicole M Rodriguez, Rebecca A Seguin, Mika Moran, Randi Garber and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. [Digital Applications in the Planning and Implementation of Structural Health Promotion and Prevention Settings: Results of a Scoping Review].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023
    Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Abby C KingStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, and Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Research & Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Sandra J WinterStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Jylana L SheatsStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Lisa G RosasStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
Matthew P BumanSchool of Nutrition and Health Promotion, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ.
Deborah SalvoMichael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Austin, TX.
Nicole M RodriguezStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Rebecca A SeguinDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca NY.
Mika MoranThe University of Haifa School of Public Health, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, the University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa, Israel.
Randi GarberEshel-The Association for the Planning and Development of Services for the Aged in Israel, Jerusalem, Israel.
Bonnie BroderickSanta Clara County Public Health Department, San Jose CA.
Susan G ZieffLaboratory for Studies in Physical Activity, Culture & Education, Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA.
Olga Lucia SarmientoSchool of Medicine Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Silvia A GonzalezSchool of Medicine Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Ann BanchoffStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Juan Rivera DommarcoCentro de Investigación en Nutrición y Salud, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.

Funding

SCRIPPS TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE (UL1)UL1RR025774 · NCRR · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI TOPOL, ERIC JEFFREY · 2008 to 2011
$16.3M
Training CoreU54EB020405 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DELP, SCOTT L · 2014 to 2018
$11.6M
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE PREVENTION TRAINING PROGRAMT32HL007034 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GARDNER, CHRISTOPHER D · 1985 to 2020
$8.7M
Virtual Advisors for Physical Activity Promotion in Underserved CommunitiesR01HL116448 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BICKMORE, TIMOTHY W., KING, ABBY C · 2013 to 2016
$3.0M
Innovative Physical Activity Interventions for Overweight LatinosR01DK102016 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KING, ABBY C · 2014 to 2017
$2.7M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025774NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116448NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007034NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020405NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK102016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhile technology is a major driver of many of society's comforts, conveniences, and advances, it has been responsible, in a significant way, for engineering regular physical activity and a number of other positive health behaviors out of people's daily lives. A key question concerns how to harness information and communication technologies (ICT) to bring about positive changes in the health promotion field. One such approach involves community-engaged "citizen science," in which local residents leverage the potential of ICT to foster data-driven consensus-building and mobilization efforts that advance physical activity at the individual, social, built environment, and policy levels.

methodThe history of citizen science in the research arena is briefly described and an evidence-based method that embeds citizen science in a multi-level, multi-sectoral community-based participatory research framework for physical activity promotion is presented.

resultsSeveral examples of this citizen science-driven community engagement framework for promoting active lifestyles, called "Our Voice", are discussed, including pilot projects from diverse communities in the U.S. as well as internationally.

conclusionsThe opportunities and challenges involved in leveraging citizen science activities as part of a broader population approach to promoting regular physical activity are explored. The strategic engagement of citizen scientists from socio-demographically diverse communities across the globe as both assessment as well as change agents provides a promising, potentially low-cost and scalable strategy for creating more active, healthful, and equitable neighborhoods and communities worldwide.

Indexed as

active livingcitizen sciencecommunityhealth equityphysical activity promotionpopulation health

Identifiers

PMID27525309
PMCPMC4978140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.