Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27524942›Full record

ArticleBiological procedures online2016

Isolation, expansion and characterization of porcine urinary bladder smooth muscle cells for tissue engineering.

Marta Pokrywczynska, Daria Balcerczyk, Arkadiusz Jundzill, Maciej Gagat, Monika Czapiewska, Tomasz Kloskowski, Maciej Nowacki, Agata M Gastecka, Magdalena Bodnar, Alina Grzanka and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological procedures online, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marta PokrywczynskaDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Medical College in Bydgoszcz, Chair of Urology, Karlowicza 24 Street, 85-092 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Daria BalcerczykDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Medical College in Bydgoszcz, Chair of Urology, Karlowicza 24 Street, 85-092 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Arkadiusz JundzillDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Medical College in Bydgoszcz, Chair of Urology, Karlowicza 24 Street, 85-092 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Maciej GagatChair of Histology and Embryology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Medical College, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Monika CzapiewskaDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Medical College in Bydgoszcz, Chair of Urology, Karlowicza 24 Street, 85-092 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Tomasz KloskowskiDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Medical College in Bydgoszcz, Chair of Urology, Karlowicza 24 Street, 85-092 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Maciej NowackiDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Medical College in Bydgoszcz, Chair of Urology, Karlowicza 24 Street, 85-092 Bydgoszcz, Poland ; Chair of Surgical Oncology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Medical College, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Agata M GasteckaDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Medical College in Bydgoszcz, Chair of Urology, Karlowicza 24 Street, 85-092 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Magdalena BodnarDepartment of Clinical Pathomorphology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Medical College, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Alina GrzankaChair of Histology and Embryology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Medical College, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Andrzej MarszalekDepartment of Clinical Pathomorphology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Medical College, Bydgoszcz, Poland ; Department of Pathology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Tomasz DrewaDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Medical College in Bydgoszcz, Chair of Urology, Karlowicza 24 Street, 85-092 Bydgoszcz, Poland ; Department of Urology, Nicolaus Copernicus Hospital, Torun, Poland.
Nicolaus Copernicus University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA key requirements for therapy utilizing the tissue engineering methodologies is use of techniques which have the capability to yield a high number of cells, from small tissue biopsy in a relatively short time. Up to date there was no optimal methods of isolation and expansion of urinary bladder smooth muscle cells (UB-SMCs). The aim of this study was to compare isolation and expansion techniques of UB-SMCs to select the most repeatable and efficient one.

methodFive protocols of porcine UB- SMCs isolation including enzymatic and explant techniques and three expansion techniques were compared. Isolation effectiveness was evaluated using trypan blue assay. Cell phenotype was confirmed by immunofluorescence staining. Proliferation rate was analyzed using MTT and X- Celligence system. Cellular senescence was assessed measuring β-galactosidase activity.

resultsEnzymatic methods using collagenase with dispase (method I) or collagenase only (method III) allowed to isolate much larger number of cells than the methods using trypsin with collagenase (method II) and collagenase after digestion with trypsin (method IV). The success rate of establishment of primary culture was the highest when the isolated cells were cultured in the Smooth muscle Growth Medium-2 (SmGM-2). Expression of the smooth muscle markers- alpha smooth muscle actin and smoothelin was the highest for cells isolated by enzymatic method I and cultured in SmGM-2. There was no significant signs of cell senescence until the 8th passage.

conclusionThe most efficient method of establishment of porcine UB-SMCs culture is enzymatic digestion of urinary bladder tissue with collagenase and dispase and culture of isolated cells in SmGM-2. This method was up to 10 times more efficient than other methods used for isolation and culture of UB-SMCs. This is an easy and consistent method for obtaining high numbers of urinary bladder smooth muscle cells.

Indexed as

IsolationPrimary cultureSmooth muscle cellsTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID27524942
PMCPMC4982216
OpenAlexW2516279043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.