ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics2016
Nonparametric spatial models for clustered ordered periodontal data.
Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A monotone single index model for spatially referenced multistate current status data.Biometrics · 2025Article
- Estimating Periodontitis Susceptibility Cases for Epidemiological Studies with Multiple Imputation.JDR clinical and translational research · 2024Article
- A Common Atoms Model for the Bayesian Nonparametric Analysis of Nested Data.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2023Article
- Bayesian nonparametric multiway regression for clustered binomial data.Stat (International Statistical Institute) · 2021Article
- Improving teeth aesthetics using a spatially shared-parameters model for independent regular lattices.Journal of applied statistics · 2021Article
- BAREB: A Bayesian repulsive biclustering model for periodontal data.Statistics in medicine · 2020Article
- A graphical model for skewed matrix-variate non-randomly missing data.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical attachment level (CAL) is regarded as the most popular measure to assess periodontal disease (PD). These probed tooth-site level measures are usually rounded and recorded as whole numbers (in mm) producing clustered (site measures within a mouth) error-prone ordinal responses representing some ordering of the underlying PD progression. In addition, it is hypothesized that PD progression can be spatially-referenced, i.e., proximal tooth-sites share similar PD status in comparison to sites that are distantly located. In this paper, we develop a Bayesian multivariate probit framework for these ordinal responses where the cut-point parameters linking the observed ordinal CAL levels to the latent underlying disease process can be fixed in advance. The latent spatial association characterizing conditional independence under Gaussian graphs is introduced via a nonparametric Bayesian approach motivated by the probit stick-breaking process, where the components of the stick-breaking weights follows a multivariate Gaussian density with the precision matrix distributed as G-Wishart. This yields a computationally simple, yet robust and flexible framework to capture the latent disease status leading to a natural clustering of tooth-sites and subjects with similar PD status (beyond spatial clustering), and improved parameter estimation through sharing of information. Both simulation studies and application to a motivating PD dataset reveal the advantages of considering this flexible nonparametric ordinal framework over other alternatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.