Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27524694›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of hand surgery2016

Preferences for Shared Decision Making in Older Adult Patients With Orthopedic Hand Conditions.

Agnes Z Dardas, Christopher Stockburger, Sean Boone, Tonya An, Ryan P Calfee

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of hand surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Patient preference for trigger finger treatment.World journal of orthopedics · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Shared Decision Making of Older Adults in Healthcare.Working with older people (Brighton, England) · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Agnes Z DardasDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Christopher StockburgerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Sean BooneDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Tonya AnDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Ryan P CalfeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. Electronic address: camdene@wudosis.wustl.edu.

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI David G DeNardo · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesTL1TR000449 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000449NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe practice of medicine is shifting from a paternalistic doctor-patient relationship to a model in which the doctor and patient collaborate to decide optimal treatment. This study aims to determine whether the older orthopedic population desires a shared decision-making approach to care and to identify patient predictors for the preferred type of approach.

methodsThis cross-sectional investigation enrolled 99 patients, minimum age 65 years, at a tertiary hand specialty practice between March and June 2015. All patients completed the Control Preferences Scale, a validated system that distinguishes among patient preferences for patient-directed, collaborative, or physician-directed decision making. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses assessed associations among demographic data; clinic encounter variables such as familiarity with provider, trauma, diagnosis, and treatment decision; and the primary outcome of Control Preferences Scale preferences.

resultsA total of 81% of patients analyzed preferred a more patient-directed role in decision making; 46% of the total cohort cited a collaborative approach as their most preferred treatment approach. Sixty-seven percent cited the most physician-directed approach as their least preferred model of decision making. In addition, 49% reported that spending more time with their physician to address questions and explain the diagnosis would be most useful when making a health care decision and 73% preferred additional written informational material. Familiarity with the provider was associated with being more likely to prefer a collaborative approach.

conclusionsOlder adult patients with symptomatic upper-extremity conditions desire more patient-directed roles in treatment decision making. Given the limited amount of reliable information obtained independently outside the office visit, our data suggest that written decision aids offer an approach to shared decision making that is most consistent with the preferences of the older orthopedic patient. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study quantifies older adults' desire to participate in decision making when choosing among treatments for hand conditions.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHandHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMultivariate AnalysisOrthopedic ProceduresPatient ParticipationControl Preferences Scaleelderlyhandoldershared decision making

Identifiers

PMID27524694
PMCPMC5081690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.