ArticleThe Journal of hand surgery2016
Preferences for Shared Decision Making in Older Adult Patients With Orthopedic Hand Conditions.
Article in The Journal of hand surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Supporting shared decision making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: a realist synthesis.BMC geriatrics · 2018Pooled it
- Engaging Patients to Ask More Questions: What's the Best Way? A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.The Journal of hand surgery · 2021Trial
- Assessing the Usability of ChatGPT Responses Compared to Other Online Information in Hand Surgery.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Exploring patient perception of decision-making in carpal tunnel release surgery: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.Hand therapy · 2024Review
- What Do Patients Encounter When Searching Online About Meniscal Surgery? An Analysis of Internet Trends.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Variations in Treatment and Costs for Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Over 55 Years of Age: A Population-Based Study.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2023Article
- Patients' and healthcare professionals' perceived facilitators and barriers for shared decision-making for frail and elderly patients in perioperative care: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Patient preference for trigger finger treatment.World journal of orthopedics · 2022Article
- CORR Insights®: What are the Implications of Excessive Internet Searches for Medical Information by Orthopaedic Patients?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2019Article
- Assessment of Surgeon Variation in Adherence to Evidence-Based Recommendations for Treatment of Trigger Finger.JAMA network open · 2019Article
- The Shared Decision Making of Older Adults in Healthcare.Working with older people (Brighton, England) · 2019Article
- The Feasibility and Usability of a Ranking Tool to Elicit Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Trigger Finger.The Journal of hand surgery · 2019Article
- Do Patient Preferences Influence Surgeon Recommendations for Treatment?The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2019Article
- Trends in Shared Decision-Making Studies From 2009 to 2018: A Bibliometric Analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2019Article
- Patient Perceptions Correlate Weakly With Observed Patient Involvement in Decision-making in Orthopaedic Surgery.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2018Observational
- The Desired Role of Health Care Providers in Guiding Older Patients With Distal Radius Fractures: A Qualitative Analysis.The Journal of hand surgery · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe practice of medicine is shifting from a paternalistic doctor-patient relationship to a model in which the doctor and patient collaborate to decide optimal treatment. This study aims to determine whether the older orthopedic population desires a shared decision-making approach to care and to identify patient predictors for the preferred type of approach.
methodsThis cross-sectional investigation enrolled 99 patients, minimum age 65 years, at a tertiary hand specialty practice between March and June 2015. All patients completed the Control Preferences Scale, a validated system that distinguishes among patient preferences for patient-directed, collaborative, or physician-directed decision making. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses assessed associations among demographic data; clinic encounter variables such as familiarity with provider, trauma, diagnosis, and treatment decision; and the primary outcome of Control Preferences Scale preferences.
resultsA total of 81% of patients analyzed preferred a more patient-directed role in decision making; 46% of the total cohort cited a collaborative approach as their most preferred treatment approach. Sixty-seven percent cited the most physician-directed approach as their least preferred model of decision making. In addition, 49% reported that spending more time with their physician to address questions and explain the diagnosis would be most useful when making a health care decision and 73% preferred additional written informational material. Familiarity with the provider was associated with being more likely to prefer a collaborative approach.
conclusionsOlder adult patients with symptomatic upper-extremity conditions desire more patient-directed roles in treatment decision making. Given the limited amount of reliable information obtained independently outside the office visit, our data suggest that written decision aids offer an approach to shared decision making that is most consistent with the preferences of the older orthopedic patient. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study quantifies older adults' desire to participate in decision making when choosing among treatments for hand conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.