ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2017
Bipolar Disorder and Population Health.
Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bipolar disorder measurement-based care: Two-phase trial in primary care.General hospital psychiatryTrial
- LiFT (a Lithium Fiber-Based Test): An At-Home Companion Diagnostics for a Safer Lithium Therapy in Bipolar Disorder.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Article
- Global perspectives on bipolar disorder treatment: in-depth comparative analysis of international guidelines for medication selection.BJPsych open · 2024Review
- Treating Bipolar Disorder in Primary Care: Diagnosis, Pharmacology, and Management.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
- The Life Goals Self-Management Mobile App for Bipolar Disorder: Consumer Feasibility, Usability, and Acceptability Study.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Bipolar disorder in primary care: a qualitative study of clinician and patient experiences with diagnosis and treatment.Family practice · 2019Article
- Bipolar Disorder in Primary Care: Integrated Care Experiences.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This Open Forum addresses considerations for improving treatment of bipolar disorder. Most individuals with bipolar disorder report not receiving treatment from a psychiatrist in the past 12 months. In the United States, a large proportion of persons with bipolar disorder seek treatment in primary care. These patients have high symptom severity and functional impairment but are less likely to receive mood-stabilizing medications. In a prior study in a primary care setting, the authors found that one-third of patients with bipolar disorder improved after receiving treatment in primary care in a statewide collaborative care program. The collaborative care approach, originally developed for treating patients with depression in primary care, may need to be strengthened or adapted for treating patients with bipolar disorder. Strategies such as telehealth or enhanced collaborative care that also addresses psychosocial needs may be needed to effectively treat patients with bipolar disorder seeking treatment in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.