Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27523749›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2016

Developmental changes in plasticity, synaptic, glia and connectivity protein levels in rat dorsal hippocampus.

Alessio Travaglia, Reto Bisaz, Emmanuel Cruz, Cristina M Alberini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Estimation of cAMP binding in hippocampus CA1 field by a fluorescent probe.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Blocking CRH receptors in adults mitigates age-related memory impairments provoked by early-life adversity.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alessio TravagliaCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, 10003 NY, USA.
Reto BisazCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, 10003 NY, USA.
Emmanuel CruzCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, 10003 NY, USA.
Cristina M AlberiniCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, 10003 NY, USA. Electronic address: ca60@nyu.edu.

Funding

Training Systems and Integrative NeuroscienceT32MH019524 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI KIORPES, LYNNE · 1992 to 2025
$5.2M
Mechanism Underlying Memory StabilizationR01MH074736 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ALBERINI, CRISTINA M · 2007 to 2016
$5.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074736NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thus far the identification and functional characterization of the molecular mechanisms underlying synaptic plasticity, learning, and memory have not been particularly dissociated from the contribution of developmental changes. Brain plasticity mechanisms have been largely identified and studied using in vitro systems mainly derived from early developmental ages, yet they are considered to be general plasticity mechanisms underlying functions -such as long-term memory- that occurs in the adult brain. Although it is possible that part of the plasticity mechanisms recruited during development is then re-recruited in plasticity responses in adulthood, systematic investigations about whether and how activity-dependent molecular responses differ over development are sparse. Notably, hippocampal-dependent memories are expressed relatively late in development, and the hippocampus undergoes and extended developmental post-natal structural and functional maturation, suggesting that the molecular mechanisms underlying hippocampal neuroplasticity may actually significantly change over development. Here we quantified the relative basal expression levels of sets of plasticity, synaptic, glia and connectivity proteins in rat dorsal hippocampus, a region that is critical for the formation of long-term explicit memories, at two developmental ages, postnatal day 17 (PN17) and PN24, which correspond to a period of relative functional immaturity and maturity, respectively, and compared them to adult age. We found that the levels of numerous proteins and/or their phosphorylation, known to be critical for synaptic plasticity underlying memory formation, including immediate early genes (IEGs), kinases, transcription factors and AMPA receptor subunits, peak at PN17 when the hippocampus is not yet able to express long-term memory. It remains to be established if these changes result from developmental basal activity or infantile learning. Conversely, among all markers investigated, the phosphorylation of calcium calmodulin kinase II α (CamKII α and of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 2 (ERK-2), and the levels of GluA1 and GluA2 significantly increase from PN17 to PN24 and then remain similar in adulthood, thus representing correlates paralleling long-term memory expression ability.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleHippocampusMaleMemoryNeurogliaNeuronal PlasticityRatsRats, Long-EvansSynapsesConnectivityDevelopmentHippocampusMemoryMyelinPlasticityProteinSynapse

Identifiers

PMID27523749
PMCPMC5050161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.