Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27523644›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2016

Neural signatures of experience-based improvements in deterministic decision-making.

Joshua J Tremel, Patryk A Laurent, David A Wolk, Mark E Wheeler, Julie A Fiez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Role of the striatum in incidental learning of sound categories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua J TremelUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: j.tremel@pitt.edu.
Patryk A LaurentJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
David A WolkUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mark E WheelerGeorgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Julie A FiezUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

Neural Substrates of Deterministic Decision MakingR21MH106317 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FIEZ, JULIE A · 2015 to 2016
$402k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH106317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feedback about our choices is a crucial part of how we gather information and learn from our environment. It provides key information about decision experiences that can be used to optimize future choices. However, our understanding of the processes through which feedback translates into improved decision-making is lacking. Using neuroimaging (fMRI) and cognitive models of decision-making and learning, we examined the influence of feedback on multiple aspects of decision processes across learning. Subjects learned correct choices to a set of 50 word pairs across eight repetitions of a concurrent discrimination task. Behavioral measures were then analyzed with both a drift-diffusion model and a reinforcement learning model. Parameter values from each were then used as fMRI regressors to identify regions whose activity fluctuates with specific cognitive processes described by the models. The patterns of intersecting neural effects across models support two main inferences about the influence of feedback on decision-making. First, frontal, anterior insular, fusiform, and caudate nucleus regions behave like performance monitors, reflecting errors in performance predictions that signal the need for changes in control over decision-making. Second, temporoparietal, supplementary motor, and putamen regions behave like mnemonic storage sites, reflecting differences in learned item values that inform optimal decision choices. As information about optimal choices is accrued, these neural systems dynamically adjust, likely shifting the burden of decision processing from controlled performance monitoring to bottom-up, stimulus-driven choice selection. Collectively, the results provide a detailed perspective on the fundamental ability to use past experiences to improve future decisions.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdultBrainDiscrimination LearningFeedback, SensoryFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOxygenPhotic StimulationReaction TimeReinforcement, PsychologyYoung AdultOxygenBasal gangliaControlDrift-diffusion modelFeedbackMemoryReinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID27523644
PMCPMC5017924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.