ArticlePlanta2016
Genetic variation and association mapping of waterlogging tolerance in chrysanthemum.
Article in Planta, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenotypic Characterization and Marker-Trait Association Analysis Using SCoT Markers in Chrysanthemum (Genes · 2025Article
- CmHRE2L-CmACS6 transcriptional cascade negatively regulates waterlogging tolerance in Chrysanthemum.Molecular horticulture · 2025Article
- RGB imaging-based evaluation of waterlogging tolerance in cultivated and wild chrysanthemums.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Comparative transcriptome analysis provides molecular insights into heterosis of waterlogging tolerance in Chrysanthemum indicum.BMC plant biology · 2024Review
- Article
- CmERF5-CmRAP2.3 transcriptional cascade positively regulates waterlogging tolerance in Chrysanthemum morifolium.Plant biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- The transcriptional coactivator CmMBF1c is required for waterlogging tolerance inHorticulture research · 2022Article
- Development of EST-SSR markers and association mapping with floral traits in Syringa oblata.BMC plant biology · 2020Article
- Anthocyanins in Floral Colors: Biosynthesis and Regulation in Chrysanthemum Flowers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Identification of favorable SNP alleles and candidate genes responsible for inflorescence-related traits via GWAS in chrysanthemum.Plant molecular biology · 2019Article
- Genome-wide association study identifies favorable SNP alleles and candidate genes for waterlogging tolerance in chrysanthemums.Horticulture research · 2019Article
- Current achievements and future prospects in the genetic breeding of chrysanthemum: a review.Horticulture research · 2019Review
- Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Waterlogging-Sensitive and Waterlogging-Tolerant Chrysanthemum morifolium Cultivars under Waterlogging Stress and Reoxygenation Conditions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Association analysis of drought tolerance in cut chrysanthemum (3 Biotech · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionForty-five molecular markers were detected significantly associated with chrysanthemum' waterlogging tolerance, and four favorable parental lines were identified as potential donors for improving waterlogging tolerance in chrysanthemum. The productivity of chrysanthemum is downgraded by waterlogging soils, which has driven a search for germplasm showing an enhanced level of waterlogging tolerance (WT). As yet little is known regarding the mode of inheritance of WT in chrysanthemum. The study set out to characterize the extent of genetic variation for WT represented in a collection of one hundred chrysanthemum accessions by testing them under both greenhouse and field conditions. A membership function value of waterlogging (MFVW), which integrated a wilting index, a chlorosis score and the proportion of dead leaf in waterlogged plants, was used as a measure of WT. The variation for MFVW among plants grown in the greenhouse (two experiments) was generally higher than that generated in field-grown (one experiment) plants. The MFVW broad sense heritability was 0.82, and the phenotypic coefficient of variation (31.8 %) was larger than the genetic one (28.8 %). Association mapping (AM) identified 45 markers related to WT: 25 by applying the general linear model (GLM) + principal component (PC) model, 16 by applying the mixed linear model (MLM), 31 by applying the MLM + Q matrix model and 12 by applying the MLM + PC model. Of the associated markers, eight and two were predictive in two and three experiments within all models, respectively; the proportion of the phenotypic variance explained by the eight associations ranged from 6.3 to 16.4 %. On the basis of their harboring all four of the leading markers E2M16-2, SSR150-6, E19M16-1 and E10M10-12, the varieties 'Nannong Xuefeng', 'Qx097', 'Nannong Xunzhang' and 'Finch' were identified as potential donors for future improvement of WT in chrysanthemum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27522648What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.