Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27522590›Full record

Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2017

Better functional outcome after single-radius TKA compared with multi-radius TKA.

Isabel Collados-Maestre, Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla, Blanca Gonzalez-Navarro, Francisco A Miralles-Muñoz, Luis Marco-Gomez, Fernando A Lopez-Prats, Vicente Gil-Guillen

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Excellent 10-year patient-reported outcomes and survival in a single-radius, cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Isabel Collados-MaestreDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Elda University Hospital, Ctra Elda-Sax s/n, 03600, Elda, Alicante, Spain.
Alejandro Lizaur-UtrillaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Elda University Hospital, Ctra Elda-Sax s/n, 03600, Elda, Alicante, Spain. lizaur1@telefonica.net.
Blanca Gonzalez-NavarroDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Elda University Hospital, Ctra Elda-Sax s/n, 03600, Elda, Alicante, Spain.
Francisco A Miralles-MuñozDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Elda University Hospital, Ctra Elda-Sax s/n, 03600, Elda, Alicante, Spain.
Luis Marco-GomezDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Elda University Hospital, Ctra Elda-Sax s/n, 03600, Elda, Alicante, Spain.
Fernando A Lopez-PratsTraumatology and Orthopaedia, Faculty of Medicine, Miguel Hernandez University, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
Vicente Gil-GuillenClinical Research Unit, Elda University Hospital, Elda, Alicante, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether the design of the femoral component influenced patient outcomes.

methodsTwo hundred and thirty-seven patients were randomized to compare functional outcomes between single-radius TKA (SR, 118 patients) and multi-radius TKA (MR, 119 patients) with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Prospective pre- and postoperative assessments were performed by the clinical and radiological criteria of the Knee Society Score (KSS), WOMAC and Short-Form 12 (SF12) questionnaires. The extension mechanism was assessed based on the quadriceps strength and chair test. Patient satisfaction was also assessed.

resultsThe median follow-up was 5.7 (range 5-7) years. At last follow-up, significant better KSSs (p = 0.001), range of motion (p = 0.001), extension lag (p = 0.020), quadriceps strength (p = 0.004), chair test (p = 0.032) and WOMAC pain (p = 0.002) were found in the SR group. Moreover, the improvements of these variables were early in the SR group (from 6 postoperative months). There were no significant differences in WOMAC function or SF12 physical and mental components. The revision rate and implant survival were similar in both groups. Satisfaction rate was significantly higher in SR group (p = 0.032).

conclusionThis study shows better results with SR cruciate-retaining femoral component than MR component. The use of SR system is recommended because, although the clinically relevant differences were moderate, the functional improvement was earlier and the patient satisfaction higher with this design. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level I.

Indexed as

Knee ProsthesisProsthesis DesignAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleFemurFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionSingle-Blind MethodMulti-radiusOutcomesQuadriceps strengthSingle-radiusTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.