Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27522230›Full record

ReviewBMC health services research2016

Centralized or decentralized perinatal surgical care for rural women: a realist review of the evidence on safety.

Jude Kornelsen, Kevin McCartney, Kim Williams

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The anesthesia human resources crisis in Canada.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jude KornelsenDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, David Strangway Building, 3rd Floor, 5950 University Blvd., Vancouver, V6T 1Z3, BC, Canada. jude.kornelsen@familymed.ubc.ca.
Kevin McCartneyDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, David Strangway Building, 3rd Floor, 5950 University Blvd., Vancouver, V6T 1Z3, BC, Canada.
Kim WilliamsPerinatal Services BC, Provincial Health Services Authority, West Tower, Suite 350, West 12th Ave., Vancouver, V5Z 3X7, BC, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAProvincial Health Services Authority · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe precipitous closure of rural maternity services in British Columbia (BC), Canada, and internationally has demanded a reevaluation of how to meet the perinatal surgical needs of rural women in accordance with the Triple Aim objectives of safety, cost-effectiveness, and satisfaction of all key stakeholders. There is emerging international evidence that General Practitioners with Enhanced Surgical Skills (GPESS) are a well-positioned health service solution due to their generalist nature in low-volume settings. A realist review was undertaken to evaluate international evidence on efficacious models of perinatal surgical care. This article presents findings of the safety of such practice, one discrete part of the full realist review.

methodsThis paper was derived from a larger review, which used a realist review methodology to guide the approach, and adhered to the RAMESES quality standard for realist reviews. Seven academic databases were searched in December 2013, using year (1990) and language (English) limiters in keeping with a rapid review approach. Mining of bibliographies in addition to consultation with international experts led to further inclusion of academic and grey literature up to March 2014.

resultsTwo hundred fifty-four articles were originally identified; 119 articles were removed from consideration for lack of fit, resulting in the review of 191 articles from the peer reviewed and grey literature. Of these, 53 pertained to safety and are considered herein. Evidence on the safety of GPESS was consistent in the literature cited. Clinical, case study, and qualitative evidence demonstrates that perinatal surgical care is equally safe when provided by GPESS and specialist physicians.

conclusionFindings allow health planners to confidently build perinatal surgical services around the contribution of GPs with enhanced surgical skills and focus on educational, regulatory, and continuing professional development mechanisms to ensure their sustainability. Volume-to-outcomes associations are variable and inconclusive with regards to safety, suggesting the need for more evidence. These findings, and the attendant health services planning directions, are reassuring as they suggest the viability of local models of care where feasible.

Indexed as

British ColumbiaCesarean SectionCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansPatient SafetyPerinatal CarePersonal SatisfactionPregnancyReferral and ConsultationRural HealthRural Health ServicesGeneral practitioners with enhanced surgical skillsGP proceduralistsGP surgeonsRealist reviewRural maternity careRural surgical care

Identifiers

PMID27522230
PMCPMC4983412
OpenAlexW2511059464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.