Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27522166›Full record

ArticleBrain stimulation

Sensorimotor Rhythm BCI with Simultaneous High Definition-Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Alters Task Performance.

Bryan S Baxter, Bradley J Edelman, Nicholas Nesbitt, Bin He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [A review of noninvasive brain-computer interfaces combined with transcranial electrical stimulation for neural rehabilitation].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Non-Invasive Brain-Computer Interfaces: State of the Art and Trends.IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Review
  4. Optogenetic Brain-Computer Interfaces.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Can vibrotactile stimulation and tDCS help inefficient BCI users?Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effects of Soft Drinks on Resting State EEG and Brain-Computer Interface Performance.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bryan S BaxterDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Bradley J EdelmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Nicholas NesbittDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Bin HeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Institute for Engineering in Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Electronic address: binhe@umn.edu.

Funding

Electrophysiological Source Imaging of Partial EpilepsyR01NS096761 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HE, BIN · 2016 to 2025
$3.6M
Spatio-temporal Dynamic Imaging of Seizure SourcesR01EB021027 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HE, BIN · 2016 to 2020
$1.3M
CRCNS: Spatiotemporal imaging study of the mechanisms of binocular rivalryR01EY023101 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HE, BIN · 2012 to 2014
$1.1M
Mulitmodal Neuroimaging for a Non-Invasive Biomimetic Brain-Computer InterfaceF31NS096964 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI EDELMAN, BRADLEY · 2016 to 2017
$52k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023101NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB021027NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS096964NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS096761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used to alter the excitability of neurons within the cerebral cortex. Improvements in motor learning have been found in multiple studies when tDCS was applied to the motor cortex before or during task learning. The motor cortex is also active during the performance of motor imagination, a cognitive task during which a person imagines, but does not execute, a movement. Motor imagery can be used with noninvasive brain computer interfaces (BCIs) to control virtual objects in up to three dimensions, but to master control of such devices requires long training times.

objectiveTo evaluate the effect of high-definition tDCS on the performance and underlying electrophysiology of motor imagery based BCI.

methodsWe utilize high-definition tDCS to investigate the effect of stimulation on motor imagery-based BCI performance across and within sessions over multiple training days.

resultsWe report a decreased time-to-hit with anodal stimulation both within and across sessions. We also found differing electrophysiological changes of the stimulated sensorimotor cortex during online BCI task performance for left vs. right trials. Cathodal stimulation led to a decrease in alpha and beta band power during task performance compared to sham stimulation for right hand imagination trials.

conclusionThese results suggest that unilateral tDCS over the sensorimotor motor cortex differentially affects cortical areas based on task specific neural activation.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesAdolescentAdultAlpha RhythmBeta RhythmFemaleHumansImaginationMaleMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformanceSensorimotor CortexTranscranial Direct Current StimulationYoung AdultBCIBrain-computer interfaceMotor imagerySensorimotor rhythmtDCSTranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID27522166
PMCPMC5143161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.