ReviewCurrent opinion in virology2016
Retroviral vector interactions with hematopoietic cells.
Review in Current opinion in virology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gene therapy in neovascular age related macular degeneration: an update.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Review
- Gene therapy for age-related macular degeneration: a promising frontier in vision preservation.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025Review
- Gene Therapy in Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema: An Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Comparisons between Plant and Animal Stem Cells Regarding Regeneration Potential and Application.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Ocular Therapeutics and Molecular Delivery Strategies for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD).International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Genetic Modification of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Neurological Disease Therapy: What Effects Does it Have on Phenotype/Cell Behavior, Determining Their Effectiveness?Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2020Review
- Gene therapy and genome editing for primary immunodeficiency diseases.Genes & diseases · 2020Review
- Evolving Gene Therapy in Primary Immunodeficiency.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) gene therapy using retroviral vectors is a powerful and promising approach to permanently correct many hematopoietic disorders. Increasing the transduction of quiescent HSCs and reducing genotoxicity are major challenges in the field. Retroviral vectors, including lentiviral and foamy vectors, have been extensively modified resulting in improved safety and efficacy. This review will focus on recent advances to improve vector entry, transduction efficiency, control of transgene expression and approaches to improve safety by modifying the retroviral integration profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.