Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27521861›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia

Assessment of blood sample stability for complete blood count using the Sysmex XN-9000 and Mindray BC-6800 analyzers.

Sabrina Buoro, Tommaso Mecca, Michela Seghezzi, Barbara Manenti, Lorenzo Cerutti, Paola Dominoni, Gavino Napolitano, Stefano Resmini, Alberto Crippa, Cosimo Ottomano and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sabrina BuoroHospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy. Electronic address: sbuoro@asst-pg23.it.
Tommaso MeccaHospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Michela SeghezziHospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Barbara ManentiHospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Lorenzo CeruttiHospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Paola DominoniHospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Gavino NapolitanoHospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Stefano ResminiHospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Alberto CrippaHospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Cosimo OttomanoCAM Centro Analisi Monza, Monza, Italy.
Giuseppe LippiUniversitaà degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Italy.
Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent hematological analyzers have different analytical performances that are often reflected in the criteria for sample stability of the complete blood count. This study aimed to assess the stability of several hematological parameters using the XN-9000 Sysmex and BC-6800 Mindray analyzers.

methodsThe impact of storage at room temperature and 4°C was evaluated after 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 36 and 48h using ten normal and 40 abnormal blood samples. The variation from the baseline measurement was evaluated by the Steel-Dwass-Critchlow-Fligner test and by Bland-Altman plots, using quality specifications and critical difference as the total allowable variation.

resultsRed blood cells and reticulocyte parameters (i.e. hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, red blood cell distribution width, immature reticulocyte fractions, low-fluorescence reticulocytes, middle-fluorescence reticulocytes, high fluorescence mononuclear cells) showed less stability compared to leukocyte and platelet parameters (except for monocyte count and mean platelet volume). The bias for hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration and red blood cell distribution width coefficient of variation was higher than the critical difference after 8h using both analyzers.

conclusionBlood samples measured with both analyzers do not show analytically significant changes in up to 2h of storage at room temperature and 4°C. However, the maximum time for analysis can be extended for up to 8h when the bias is compared to the critical difference.

Indexed as

BC-6800Complete blood countPre-analytical phaseSample stabilityXN-9000

Identifiers

PMID27521861
PMCPMC4997904
OpenAlexW2463494250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.