ArticleAnnals of vascular surgery2017
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials and Electroencephalography during Carotid Endarterectomy Predict Late Stroke but not Death.
Article in Annals of vascular surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodal neuromonitoring during aortic arch surgeries: A prospective study of neurologic outcomes and postoperative recovery.JTCVS techniques · 2026Article
- Stroke in pediatric ventricular assist device support.JHLT open · 2025Article
- Intraoperative neuromonitoring as an independent predictor for postoperative delirium in ICU following aneurysm clipping.eNeurologicalSci · 2025Article
- Inferential Statistics for Electrophysiological Analysis of Paretic Upper Limb-sensory Deficits and Muscle Imbalance in Patients with Acute Stroke.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2025Article
- Can NIRS be a surrogate indicator of elective shunt in carotid endarterectomy? A single-center observational retrospective study says no.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024Observational
- Which sites better represent the sensory function of hands in convalescent stroke patients? A study based on electrophysiological examination.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Anaesthesia and multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring in carotid endarterectomy. Chronological evolution and effects on intraoperative neurophysiology.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2021Article
- Surgical Technique for Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Methods and Problems.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2020Review
- Predictors of cross-clamp-induced intraoperative monitoring changes during carotid endarterectomy using both electroencephalography and somatosensory evoked potentials.Journal of vascular surgery · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgrondLate stroke and death rates are anticipated to be higher in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) compared with healthy counterparts. However, little is known regarding predictors other than the baseline comorbidities. We have recently shown that dual intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring improves the ability to predict perioperative strokes. We seek to determine if dual intraoperative monitoring (IOM) can further predict long-term strokes and death.
methodsConsecutive patients who underwent CEA under dual SSEP and EEG IOM between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010 were analyzed. Patients were divided in 2 groups, those with and those without IOM changes. IOM changes were classified as either occurring during carotid cross-clamp placement or at any time during the operation. End points were time to stroke and death. Log-rank tests and Cox regression analysis were used to identify predictors of postoperative stroke and death.
resultsA total of 853 CEAs (mean age 70.6 ± 9.5 years, 58.7% male, 38.9% symptomatic) were performed during the study period with a mean clinical follow-up of 48 ± 38 months. One hundred seven patients (13.6%) had significant SSEP or EEG changes at the time of clamping, while considerably more patients (217, 25.4%) had SSEP and/or EEG changes recorded at any point during the procedure, including clamping. Baseline characteristics including rates of bilateral disease, statin use, and antiplatelet use were similar between groups. Female gender, symptomatic disease, and significant contralateral carotid stenosis were more frequent in the group with IOM changes. The overall stroke-free survival rate at 5 years was significantly higher in patients without IOM changes (94.7% vs. 88.2%, P < 0.05) and at 10 years (86.1% vs. 78.0%, P < 0.05). Despite differences in stroke-free survival, overall survival at 10 years was not different between groups (44.0% in patients with IOM changes vs. 42.8% in patients without, P = 0.7). Renal insufficiency (hazards ratio [HR] 2.13, P = 0.03), diabetes (HR 1.84, P = 005), and age > 80 at the time of operation (HR 3.24, P = 0.001) were significant predictors of late stroke, while statins were significantly protective (HR 0.55, P = 0.05). Controlling for these factors, IOM changes (HR 2.5, P = 0.004) were a strong predictor of long-term risk of stroke after CEA.
conclusionIntraoperative SSEP and/or EEG changes are predictive of late stroke but not death following CEA indicating a need for further elucidation and management of the underlying risk factors driving the elevated stroke risk in this subset of CEA patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.