Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27521522›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2017

Chasing the recipe for a pro-regenerative immune system.

James W Godwin, Alexander R Pinto, Nadia A Rosenthal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cardiac commitment driven by MyoD expression in pericardial stem cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Molecular characterization of the immediate wound response of the solitary ascidian Polycarpa mytiligera.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. To regenerate or not to regenerate: Vertebrate model organisms of regeneration-competency and -incompetency.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Engineering of Immune Microenvironment for Enhanced Tissue Remodeling.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2022
    Review
  20. Review

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James W GodwinThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, 04609, USA; MDI Biological Laboratory, Salisbury Cove, ME 04672, USA; Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Victoria, 3800, Australia. Electronic address: james.godwin@jax.org.
Alexander R PintoThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, 04609, USA.
Nadia A RosenthalThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, 04609, USA.

Funding

The Maine Biomedical Research Network (INBRE)P20GM103423 · NIGMS · MOUNT DESERT ISLAND BIOLOGICAL LAB · PI Dustin Lynn Updike · 2012 to 2026
$60.0M
Understanding the role of thyroid hormone signaling during axolotl limb regenerationP20GM104318 · NIGMS · MOUNT DESERT ISLAND BIOLOGICAL LAB · PI DRUMMOND, IAIN A. · 2013 to 2023
$23.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103423NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM104318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of the key ingredients and essential processes required to achieve perfect tissue regeneration in humans has so far remained elusive. Injury in vertebrates induces an obligatory wound response that will precede or overlap any regeneration specific program or scarring outcome. This process shapes the cellular and molecular landscape of the tissue, influencing the success of endogenous repair pathways or for potential clinical intervention. The involvement of immune cells is also required for aspects of development extending beyond the initial inflammatory phase of wounding. It has now become clear from amphibian, fish and mammalian models of tissue injury that the type of immune response and the profile of immune cells attending the site of injury can act as the gatekeepers that determine wound repair quality. The heterogeneity among innate and adaptive immune cell populations, along with the developmental origin of these cells, form key ingredients affecting the potential for downstream repair and the suppression of fibrosis. Cell-to-cell interactions between immune cells, such as macrophages and T cells, with stem cells and mesenchymal cells are critically important for shaping this process and these exchanges, are in turn influenced by the type of injury, tissue location and developmental stage of the organism. Developmentally, mouse cardiac regeneration is restricted to early stages of postnatal life where the balance of innate to adaptive immune cells may be poised towards regeneration. In the injured adult mouse liver, specific macrophage subsets improve repair while other bone marrow derived cells can exacerbate injury. Other studies using genetically diverse mice have shown enhanced regeneration in certain strains, restricted to specific tissues. This enhanced repair is linked with expression of genes such as Insulin-like Growth Factor- 1 (IGF-1) and activin (Act 1), that both play important roles in shaping the immune system. Immune cells are now appreciated to have powerful influences on critical cell types required for regeneration success. The winning recipe for tissue regeneration is likely to be found ultimately by identifying the genetic elements and specific cell populations that limit or allow intrinsic potential. This will be essential for developing therapeutic strategies for tissue regeneration in humans.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionHumansImmune SystemImmunity, CellularImmunity, InnateRegenerationWound HealingFibrosisInflammationInnate immunityRegenerationWound healing

Identifiers

PMID27521522
PMCPMC5338634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.