Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27521411›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2016

Patients living with disabilities: The need for high-quality primary care.

Aisha Lofters, Sara Guilcher, Niraj Maulkhan, James Milligan, Joseph Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aisha LoftersScientist with the Centre for Urban Health Solutions of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute at St Michael's Hospital in Toronto, Ont. aisha.lofters@utoronto.ca.
Sara GuilcherAssistant Professor with the Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy at the University of Toronto.
Niraj MaulkhanResearch assistant with the Centre for Family Medicine Family Health Team at the time of this research.
James MilliganFamily physician with the Centre for Family Medicine Family Health Team.
Joseph LeeFamily physician with the Centre for Family Medicine Family Health Team.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the potential risk factors for lower-quality primary care, the potential markers of unmet needs in primary care, and the willingness to participate in future research among primary care patients with versus without physical disabilities.

designA waiting room survey using a convenience sample.

settingA family health team (FHT) in Kitchener-Waterloo, Ont, with a designated Mobility Clinic.

participantsA total of 40 patients seen at the FHT Mobility Clinic and 80 patients from the general patient population of the same FHT.

main outcome measuresSocioeconomic status and social capital, number of self-reported emergency department visits and hospitalizations in the preceding year, and willingness of the patients in the 2 groups to participate in future research studies.

resultsPatients from the Mobility Clinic were more than twice as likely to be receiving benefits or social assistance (75.0% vs 32.1%, P < .001), were twice as likely to report an annual household income of less than $40000 (58.6% vs 29.2%, P = .006), and were more likely to report their health status to be fair or poor (42.5% vs 16.2%, P = .002). Half of Mobility Clinic patients had visited the emergency department at least once in the preceding year, compared with 29.7% in the general patient population (P = .027). When asked if they would be willing to provide their health card number in the future so that it could be linked to health care data for research, 82.5% of Mobility Clinic patients agreed versus 55.0% of those in the general patient population (P = .004).

conclusionIn this study, patients with disabilities were at a social disadvantage compared with their peers without disabilities and were more likely to use the emergency department, suggesting that they had unmet health needs. Future research should continue to explore this patient population and to investigate if an interprofessional primary health care team approach focused on patients with disabilities can help to increase quality of care.

Indexed as

Health StatusPersons with DisabilitiesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareSocial Class

Identifiers

PMID27521411
PMCPMC4982744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.