Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27521303›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2017

Modulating the neural bases of persuasion: why/how, gain/loss, and users/non-users.

I Stephanie Vezich, Perri L Katzman, Daniel L Ames, Emily B Falk, Matthew D Lieberman

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04279483 (Geo Smoking Study and Neural and Geospatial Examination of Smokers' Exposure to Retail Environments), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04279483 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Geo Smoking Study and Neural and Geospatial Examination of Smokers' Exposure to Retail Environments

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineRan2019 to 2024Enrolled343ConditionsSmoking, Tobacco, Smoking, Smoking, CigaretteArmsTobacco retailer, Non-tobacco retailer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Brain system integration and message consistent health behavior change.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Social networks and neural receptivity to persuasive health messages.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

I Stephanie VezichDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Perri L KatzmanDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Daniel L AmesDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Emily B FalkAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Matthew D LiebermanDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Designing persuasive content is challenging, in part because people can be poor predictors of their actions. Medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) activation during message exposure reliably predicts downstream behavior, but past work has been largely atheoretical. We replicated past results on this relationship and tested two additional framing effects known to alter message receptivity. First, we examined gain- vs. loss-framed reasons for a health behavior (sunscreen use). Consistent with predictions from prospect theory, we observed greater MPFC activity to gain- vs. loss-framed messages, and this activity was associated with behavior. This relationship was stronger for those who were not previously sunscreen users. Second, building on theories of action planning, we compared neural activity during messages regarding how vs. why to enact the behavior. We observed rostral inferior parietal lobule and posterior inferior frontal gyrus activity during action planning ("how" messages), and this activity was associated with behavior; this is in contrast to the relationship between MPFC activity during the "why" (i.e., gain and loss) messages and behavior. These results reinforce that persuasion occurs in part via self-value integration-seeing value and incorporating persuasive messages into one's self-concept-and extend this work to demonstrate how message framing and action planning may influence this process.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPersuasive CommunicationAdolescentCooperative BehaviorFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansIntentionMaleMotivationPrefrontal CortexSelf ConceptSkin NeoplasmsSunscreening AgentsYoung AdultSunscreening Agentsaction planningfMRImessage framingMPFCpersuasion

Identifiers

PMID27521303
PMCPMC5516692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.